lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20201029023933.24548-4-zhang.lyra@gmail.com>
Date:   Thu, 29 Oct 2020 10:39:33 +0800
From:   Chunyan Zhang <zhang.lyra@...il.com>
To:     Wim Van Sebroeck <wim@...ux-watchdog.org>,
        Guenter Roeck <linux@...ck-us.net>
Cc:     linux-watchdog@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        Orson Zhai <orsonzhai@...il.com>,
        Baolin Wang <baolin.wang7@...il.com>,
        Chunyan Zhang <zhang.lyra@...il.com>,
        Chunyan Zhang <chunyan.zhang@...soc.com>,
        Lingling Xu <ling_ling.xu@...soc.com>,
        Jingchao Ye <jingchao.ye@...soc.com>,
        Xiaoqing Wu <xiaoqing.wu@...soc.com>
Subject: [PATCH v2 3/3] watchdog: sprd: change to use usleep_range() instead of busy loop

From: Chunyan Zhang <chunyan.zhang@...soc.com>

After changing to check busy bit for the previous loading operation instead
of the current one, for most of cases, the busy bit is not set for the
first time of read, so there's no need to check so frequently, so this
patch use usleep_range() to replace cpu_relax() to avoid busy loop.

Also this patch change the max times to 11 which would be enough, since
according to the specification, the busy bit would be set after a new
loading operation and last 2 or 3 RTC clock cycles (about 60us~92us).

Fixes: 477603467009 ("watchdog: Add Spreadtrum watchdog driver")
Original-by: Lingling Xu <ling_ling.xu@...soc.com>
Signed-off-by: Chunyan Zhang <chunyan.zhang@...soc.com>
---
 drivers/watchdog/sprd_wdt.c | 10 ++++++----
 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/watchdog/sprd_wdt.c b/drivers/watchdog/sprd_wdt.c
index b9b1daa9e2a4..e8097551dfcd 100644
--- a/drivers/watchdog/sprd_wdt.c
+++ b/drivers/watchdog/sprd_wdt.c
@@ -53,7 +53,7 @@
 
 #define SPRD_WDT_CNT_HIGH_SHIFT		16
 #define SPRD_WDT_LOW_VALUE_MASK		GENMASK(15, 0)
-#define SPRD_WDT_LOAD_TIMEOUT		1000
+#define SPRD_WDT_LOAD_TIMEOUT		11
 
 struct sprd_wdt {
 	void __iomem *base;
@@ -109,15 +109,17 @@ static int sprd_wdt_load_value(struct sprd_wdt *wdt, u32 timeout,
 	u32 prtmr_step = pretimeout * SPRD_WDT_CNT_STEP;
 
 	/*
-	 * Waiting the load value operation done,
-	 * it needs two or three RTC clock cycles.
+	 * Checking busy bit to make sure the previous loading operation is
+	 * done. According to the specification, the busy bit would be set
+	 * after a new loading operation and last 2 or 3 RTC clock
+	 * cycles (about 60us~92us).
 	 */
 	do {
 		val = readl_relaxed(wdt->base + SPRD_WDT_INT_RAW);
 		if (!(val & SPRD_WDT_LD_BUSY_BIT))
 			break;
 
-		cpu_relax();
+		usleep_range(10, 100);
 	} while (delay_cnt++ < SPRD_WDT_LOAD_TIMEOUT);
 
 	if (delay_cnt >= SPRD_WDT_LOAD_TIMEOUT)
-- 
2.20.1

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ