lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Date: Thu, 29 Oct 2020 09:40:19 +0530 From: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@...aro.org> To: Stephen Boyd <sboyd@...nel.org> Cc: Nishanth Menon <nm@...com>, Viresh Kumar <vireshk@...nel.org>, linux-pm@...r.kernel.org, Vincent Guittot <vincent.guittot@...aro.org>, Rafael Wysocki <rjw@...ysocki.net>, Rob Clark <robdclark@...il.com>, Dmitry Osipenko <digetx@...il.com>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH] opp: Reduce the size of critical section in _opp_table_kref_release() On 28-10-20, 16:32, Stephen Boyd wrote: > Quoting Viresh Kumar (2020-10-27 00:57:06) > > There is a lot of stuff here which can be done outside of the big > > opp_table_lock, do that. This helps avoiding few circular dependency > > lockdeps around debugfs and interconnects. > > > > Reported-by: Rob Clark <robdclark@...il.com> > > Reported-by: Dmitry Osipenko <digetx@...il.com> > > Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@...aro.org> > > --- > > Any Fixes tag? The circular dependency lockdep appears with 5.11 stuff and so we don't need to fix it in any of the earlier releases. And so I didn't wanted to bother with the fixes tag, as the code had been like this for ever. > Reviewed-by: Stephen Boyd <sboyd@...nel.org> Thanks a lot. I was a bit worried about the crazy idea I had to solve this :) -- viresh
Powered by blists - more mailing lists