linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 11/13] m68k/mm: make node data and node setup depend on CONFIG

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20201028185741.GI1428094@kernel.org>
Date:   Wed, 28 Oct 2020 20:57:41 +0200
From:   Mike Rapoport <rppt@...nel.org>
To:     Michael Schmitz <schmitzmic@...il.com>
Cc:     Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@...ux-m68k.org>,
        Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
        Alexey Dobriyan <adobriyan@...il.com>,
        Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@....com>,
        Greg Ungerer <gerg@...ux-m68k.org>,
        John Paul Adrian Glaubitz <glaubitz@...sik.fu-berlin.de>,
        Jonathan Corbet <corbet@....net>,
        Matt Turner <mattst88@...il.com>, Meelis Roos <mroos@...ux.ee>,
        Mike Rapoport <rppt@...ux.ibm.com>,
        Russell King <linux@...linux.org.uk>,
        Tony Luck <tony.luck@...el.com>,
        Vineet Gupta <vgupta@...opsys.com>,
        Will Deacon <will@...nel.org>,
        alpha <linux-alpha@...r.kernel.org>,
        Linux ARM <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
        "open list:DOCUMENTATION" <linux-doc@...r.kernel.org>,
        Linux FS Devel <linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org>,
        "linux-ia64@...r.kernel.org" <linux-ia64@...r.kernel.org>,
        Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        linux-m68k <linux-m68k@...ts.linux-m68k.org>,
        Linux MM <linux-mm@...ck.org>,
        arcml <linux-snps-arc@...ts.infradead.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 11/13] m68k/mm: make node data and node setup depend on
 CONFIG_DISCONTIGMEM

On Thu, Oct 29, 2020 at 07:14:38AM +1300, Michael Schmitz wrote:
> Hi Mike,
> 
> On 29/10/20 12:16 AM, Mike Rapoport wrote:
> > Hi Geert,
> > 
> > On Wed, Oct 28, 2020 at 10:25:49AM +0100, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:
> > > Hi Mike,
> > > 
> > > On Tue, Oct 27, 2020 at 12:31 PM Mike Rapoport <rppt@...nel.org> wrote:
> > > > From: Mike Rapoport <rppt@...ux.ibm.com>
> > > > 
> > > > The pg_data_t node structures and their initialization currently depends on
> > > > !CONFIG_SINGLE_MEMORY_CHUNK. Since they are required only for DISCONTIGMEM
> > > > make this dependency explicit and replace usage of
> > > > CONFIG_SINGLE_MEMORY_CHUNK with CONFIG_DISCONTIGMEM where appropriate.
> > > > 
> > > > The CONFIG_SINGLE_MEMORY_CHUNK was implicitly disabled on the ColdFire MMU
> > > > variant, although it always presumed a single memory bank. As there is no
> > > > actual need for DISCONTIGMEM in this case, make sure that ColdFire MMU
> > > > systems set CONFIG_SINGLE_MEMORY_CHUNK to 'y'.
> > > > 
> > > > Signed-off-by: Mike Rapoport <rppt@...ux.ibm.com>
> > > Thanks for your patch!
> > > 
> > > > ---
> > > >   arch/m68k/Kconfig.cpu           | 6 +++---
> > > >   arch/m68k/include/asm/page_mm.h | 2 +-
> > > >   arch/m68k/mm/init.c             | 4 ++--
> > > >   3 files changed, 6 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
> > > Is there any specific reason you didn't convert the checks for
> > > CONFIG_SINGLE_MEMORY_CHUNK in arch/m68k/kernel/setup_mm.c
> > In arch/m68k/kernel/setup_mm.c the CONFIG_SINGLE_MEMORY_CHUNK is needed
> > for the case when a system has two banks, the kernel is loaded into the
> > second bank and so the first bank cannot be used as normal memory. It
> > does not matter what memory model will be used in this case.
> 
> 
> That case used to be detected just fine at run time (by dint of the second
> memory chunk having an address below the first; the chunk the kernel resides
> in is always listed first), even without using CONFIG_SINGLE_MEMORY_CHUNK.
 
Right, CONFIG_SINGLE_MEMORY_CHUNK in arch/m68k/kernel/setup_mm.c is used
to force using a single bank of memory regardless of run time detection. 

> Unless you changed that behaviour (and I see nothing in your patch that
> would indicate that), this is still true.
> 
> Converting the check as Geert suggested, without also adding a test for
> out-of-order memory bank addresses, would implicitly treat DISCONTIGMEM as 
> SINGLE_MEMORY_CHUNK, regardless of bank ordering. I don't think that is what
> we really want?

It is in a way the case now when !SINGLE_MEMORY_CHUNK == DISCONTIGMEM.
So forcing SIGNLE_MEMORY_CHUNK at compile time would also mean forcing
FLATMEM.

After these changes I think SINGLE_MEMORY_CHUNK is not needed at all.

> Cheers,
> 
>     Michael
> 
> 
> > 
> > > and arch/m68k/include/asm/virtconvert.h?
> > I remember I had build errors and troubles with include file
> > dependencies if I changed it there, but I might be mistaken. I'll
> > recheck again.
> > 
> > > Gr{oetje,eeting}s,
> > > 
> > >                          Geert
> > > 
> > > -- 
> > > Geert Uytterhoeven -- There's lots of Linux beyond ia32 -- geert@...ux-m68k.org
> > > 
> > > In personal conversations with technical people, I call myself a hacker. But
> > > when I'm talking to journalists I just say "programmer" or something like that.
> > >                                  -- Linus Torvalds

-- 
Sincerely yours,
Mike.