[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <30075bb8-caed-c4de-c09e-e0f6fb964a8d@redhat.com>
Date: Thu, 29 Oct 2020 09:15:47 +0100
From: David Hildenbrand <david@...hat.com>
To: Mike Rapoport <rppt@...nel.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
Cc: Albert Ou <aou@...s.berkeley.edu>,
Andy Lutomirski <luto@...nel.org>,
Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@...nel.crashing.org>,
Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>,
Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@....com>,
Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@...ibm.com>,
Christoph Lameter <cl@...ux.com>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@...ux.intel.com>,
David Rientjes <rientjes@...gle.com>,
"Edgecombe, Rick P" <rick.p.edgecombe@...el.com>,
"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>,
Heiko Carstens <hca@...ux.ibm.com>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
Joonsoo Kim <iamjoonsoo.kim@....com>,
"Kirill A. Shutemov" <kirill@...temov.name>,
Len Brown <len.brown@...el.com>,
Michael Ellerman <mpe@...erman.id.au>,
Mike Rapoport <rppt@...ux.ibm.com>,
Palmer Dabbelt <palmer@...belt.com>,
Paul Mackerras <paulus@...ba.org>,
Paul Walmsley <paul.walmsley@...ive.com>,
Pavel Machek <pavel@....cz>, Pekka Enberg <penberg@...nel.org>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...ysocki.net>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Vasily Gorbik <gor@...ux.ibm.com>,
Will Deacon <will@...nel.org>,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-mm@...ck.org, linux-pm@...r.kernel.org,
linux-riscv@...ts.infradead.org, linux-s390@...r.kernel.org,
linuxppc-dev@...ts.ozlabs.org, sparclinux@...r.kernel.org,
x86@...nel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/4] arch, mm: improve robustness of direct map
manipulation
On 25.10.20 11:15, Mike Rapoport wrote:
> From: Mike Rapoport <rppt@...ux.ibm.com>
>
> Hi,
>
> During recent discussion about KVM protected memory, David raised a concern
> about usage of __kernel_map_pages() outside of DEBUG_PAGEALLOC scope [1].
>
> Indeed, for architectures that define CONFIG_ARCH_HAS_SET_DIRECT_MAP it is
> possible that __kernel_map_pages() would fail, but since this function is
> void, the failure will go unnoticed.
>
> Moreover, there's lack of consistency of __kernel_map_pages() semantics
> across architectures as some guard this function with
> #ifdef DEBUG_PAGEALLOC, some refuse to update the direct map if page
> allocation debugging is disabled at run time and some allow modifying the
> direct map regardless of DEBUG_PAGEALLOC settings.
>
> This set straightens this out by restoring dependency of
> __kernel_map_pages() on DEBUG_PAGEALLOC and updating the call sites
> accordingly.
>
So, I was primarily wondering if we really have to touch direct mappings
in hibernation code, or if we can avoid doing that. I was wondering if
we cannot simply do something like kmap() when trying to access a
!mapped page. Similar to reading old-os memory after kexec when in
kdump. Just a thought.
--
Thanks,
David / dhildenb
Powered by blists - more mailing lists