[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20201029052225.GC282324@kroah.com>
Date: Thu, 29 Oct 2020 06:22:25 +0100
From: Greg KH <greg@...ah.com>
To: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>
Cc: Shuah Khan <shuah@...nel.org>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Linux Next Mailing List <linux-next@...r.kernel.org>,
Tommi Rantala <tommi.t.rantala@...ia.com>
Subject: Re: linux-next: manual merge of the staging tree with the
kselftest-fixes tree
On Thu, Oct 29, 2020 at 01:27:13PM +1100, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> Today's linux-next merge of the staging tree got conflicts in:
>
> tools/testing/selftests/android/ion/ipcsocket.c
> tools/testing/selftests/android/ion/ipcsocket.h
>
> between commit:
>
> 08c5d41130e5 ("selftests: android: fix multiple definition of sock_name")
>
> from the kselftest-fixes tree and commit:
>
> e722a295cf49 ("staging: ion: remove from the tree")
>
> from the staging tree.
>
> I fixed it up (I just removed the files) and can carry the fix as
> necessary. This is now fixed as far as linux-next is concerned, but any
> non trivial conflicts should be mentioned to your upstream maintainer
> when your tree is submitted for merging. You may also want to consider
> cooperating with the maintainer of the conflicting tree to minimise any
> particularly complex conflicts.
Easy fix, thanks!
greg k-h
Powered by blists - more mailing lists