linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 4/5] dt-bindings: arm: sunxi: add Elimo bindings

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Thu, 29 Oct 2020 18:24:34 +0800
From:   Icenowy Zheng <icenowy@...c.io>
To:     Maxime Ripard <maxime@...no.tech>,
        Matteo Scordino <matteo.scordino@...il.com>
CC:     wens@...e.org, robh+dt@...nel.org,
        linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        Paul Kocialkowski <paul.kocialkowski@...tlin.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 4/5] dt-bindings: arm: sunxi: add Elimo bindings



于 2020年10月29日 GMT+08:00 下午6:13:04, Maxime Ripard <maxime@...no.tech> 写到:
>Hi,
>
>On Thu, Oct 29, 2020 at 02:19:59AM +0000, Matteo Scordino wrote:
>> Document board compatible names for Elimo Engineering Impetus and
>Initium
>> 
>> Signed-off-by: Matteo Scordino <matteo.scordino@...il.com>
>> ---
>>  Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/sunxi.yaml | 10 ++++++++++
>>  1 file changed, 10 insertions(+)
>> 
>> diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/sunxi.yaml
>b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/sunxi.yaml
>> index 0f23133672a3..55405809ec91 100644
>> --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/sunxi.yaml
>> +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/sunxi.yaml
>> @@ -898,3 +898,13 @@ properties:
>>          items:
>>            - const: xunlong,orangepi-zero-plus2-h3
>>            - const: allwinner,sun8i-h3
>> +
>> +      - description: Elimo Engineering Impetus SoM
>> +        items:
>> +          - const: elimo,impetus
>> +          - const: allwinner,sun8i-s3
>> +
>> +      - description: Elimo Engineering Initium
>> +        items:
>> +          - const: elimo,initium
>> +          - const: allwinner,sun8i-s3
>
>This should be ordered alphabetically, and most importantly, must match
>the ones you have in the DT.
>
>Here, we have kind of a mess already: the Lichee Zero+ uses
>,sipeed,lichee-zero-plus, sochip,s3, allwinner,sun8i-v3, while the
>pinecube uses pine64,pinecube, allwinner,sun8i-s3
>
>IIRC the S3 and V3 are pretty much the same SoCs, so the first one
>seems
>to make more sense to me, but then we should fix the pinecube.

I agree with this.

PineCube is originally designed for S3L (which is branded under Allwinner)
but switch to S3 finally, so I may made error when adapting.

>
>Maxime