[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <01065580-8602-52e6-0cca-22d1aa20a540@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 29 Oct 2020 12:04:13 +0100
From: Alejandro Colomar <colomar.6.4.3@...il.com>
To: libc-help@...rceware.org
Cc: linux-man <linux-man@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"libc-alpha@...rceware.org" <libc-alpha@...rceware.org>,
"Michael Kerrisk (man-pages)" <mtk.manpages@...il.com>
Subject: Re: Possible bug in getdents64()?
[[ CC += linux-man, linux-kernel, libc-alpha, mtk ]]
On 2020-10-28 20:26, Alejandro Colomar wrote:
> The manual page for getdents64() says the prototype should be the
> following:
>
> int getdents64(unsigned int fd, struct linux_dirent64 *dirp,
> unsigned int count);
>
>
> Note the type of 'count': 'unsigned int'
> (usually a 32-bit unsigned integer).
> And the Linux kernel seems to use those types (fs/readdir.c:351):
>
> SYSCALL_DEFINE3(getdents64, unsigned int, fd,
> struct linux_dirent64 __user *, dirent,
> unsigned int, count)
> {
> ...
> }
>
> But glibc uses 'size_t' (usually a 64-bit unsigned integer)
> for the parameter 'count' (sysdeps/unix/linux/getdents64.c:25):
>
>
> /* The kernel struct linux_dirent64 matches the 'struct dirent64' type. */
> ssize_t
> __getdents64 (int fd, void *buf, size_t nbytes)
> {
> /* The system call takes an unsigned int argument, and some length
> checks in the kernel use an int type. */
> if (nbytes > INT_MAX)
> nbytes = INT_MAX;
> return INLINE_SYSCALL_CALL (getdents64, fd, buf, nbytes);
> }
> libc_hidden_def (__getdents64)
> weak_alias (__getdents64, getdents64)
>
>
>
> Isn't it undefined behavior to pass a variable of a different (larger)
> type to a variadic function than what it expects?
>
> Is that behavior defined in this implementation?
>
> Wouldn't a cast to 'unsigned int' be needed?
>
>
> Thanks,
>
> Alex
Powered by blists - more mailing lists