lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CA+FuTSczR03KGNdksH2KyAyzoR9jc6avWNrD+UWyc7sXd44J4w@mail.gmail.com>
Date:   Fri, 30 Oct 2020 12:29:26 -0400
From:   Willem de Bruijn <willemdebruijn.kernel@...il.com>
To:     Xie He <xie.he.0141@...il.com>
Cc:     Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>,
        "David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
        Network Development <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
        linux-kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        Willem de Bruijn <willemdebruijn.kernel@...il.com>,
        Krzysztof Halasa <khc@...waw.pl>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next v4 4/5] net: hdlc_fr: Do skb_reset_mac_header for
 skbs received on normal PVC devices

On Thu, Oct 29, 2020 at 10:33 PM Xie He <xie.he.0141@...il.com> wrote:
>
> When an skb is received on a normal (non-Ethernet-emulating) PVC device,
> call skb_reset_mac_header before we pass it to upper layers.
>
> This is because normal PVC devices don't have header_ops, so any header we
> have would not be visible to upper layer code when sending, so the header
> shouldn't be visible to upper layer code when receiving, either.
>
> Cc: Willem de Bruijn <willemdebruijn.kernel@...il.com>
> Cc: Krzysztof Halasa <khc@...waw.pl>
> Signed-off-by: Xie He <xie.he.0141@...il.com>

Acked-by: Willem de Bruijn <willemb@...gle.com>

Should this go to net if a bugfix though?

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ