linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 2/2] ASoC: intel: sof

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20201030170156.GH4405@sirena.org.uk>
Date:   Fri, 30 Oct 2020 17:01:56 +0000
From:   Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>
To:     "Lu, Brent" <brent.lu@...el.com>
Cc:     Pierre-Louis Bossart <pierre-louis.bossart@...ux.intel.com>,
        "alsa-devel@...a-project.org" <alsa-devel@...a-project.org>,
        Guennadi Liakhovetski <guennadi.liakhovetski@...ux.intel.com>,
        "Rojewski, Cezary" <cezary.rojewski@...el.com>,
        Kuninori Morimoto <kuninori.morimoto.gx@...esas.com>,
        Kai Vehmanen <kai.vehmanen@...ux.intel.com>,
        Jason Yan <yanaijie@...wei.com>,
        "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        Takashi Iwai <tiwai@...e.com>,
        Jie Yang <yang.jie@...ux.intel.com>,
        Liam Girdwood <liam.r.girdwood@...ux.intel.com>,
        "Nujella, Sathyanarayana" <sathyanarayana.nujella@...el.com>,
        Fred Oh <fred.oh@...ux.intel.com>,
        "Wang, Rander" <rander.wang@...el.com>,
        Bard Liao <yung-chuan.liao@...ux.intel.com>,
        "Zhi, Yong" <yong.zhi@...el.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] ASoC: intel: sof_rt5682: Add quirk for Dooly

On Fri, Oct 30, 2020 at 04:44:17PM +0000, Lu, Brent wrote:
> , Brent Lu wrote:

> > Wondering if patch1 would be enough?

> Dooly has DMI family string " Google_Hatch" so the DMI quirk will overwrite the
> driver_data. I asked google but they prefer not removing this string so it seems to
> me that one extra DMI quirk is needed.

I think this needs at least a comment otherwise someone might come along
later and clean it up.

> The other way is using acpi_dev_present() in probe to update the quirk with correct
> codec setting. Which one do you think is better?

I don't have a strong opinion either way.

Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (489 bytes)