[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20201030193955.GA3568909@otcwcpicx6.sc.intel.com>
Date: Fri, 30 Oct 2020 19:39:55 +0000
From: Fenghua Yu <fenghua.yu@...el.com>
To: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
Tony Luck <tony.luck@...el.com>,
Christopherson Sean J <sean.j.christopherson@...el.com>,
Ashok Raj <ashok.raj@...el.com>,
Ravi V Shankar <ravi.v.shankar@...el.com>,
linux-kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, x86 <x86@...nel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH RFC v2 2/4] x86/bus_lock: Handle warn and fatal in #DB
for bus lock
Hi, PeterZ,
On Thu, Oct 29, 2020 at 10:27:47AM +0100, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 28, 2020 at 08:28:02PM +0000, Fenghua Yu wrote:
> > diff --git a/arch/x86/include/uapi/asm/debugreg.h b/arch/x86/include/uapi/asm/debugreg.h
> > index d95d080b30e3..61078319fc6c 100644
> > --- a/arch/x86/include/uapi/asm/debugreg.h
> > +++ b/arch/x86/include/uapi/asm/debugreg.h
> > @@ -16,7 +16,7 @@
> > are either reserved or not of interest to us. */
> >
> > /* Define reserved bits in DR6 which are always set to 1 */
> > -#define DR6_RESERVED (0xFFFF0FF0)
> > +#define DR6_RESERVED (0xFFFF07F0)
>
> NAK
You are right. I will remove this piece of code in the next version.
Thank you very much for your review!
-Fenghua
Powered by blists - more mailing lists