linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v6 4/5] iommu/vt-d: Add iommu

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20201030145655.07c692d8@w520.home>
Date:   Fri, 30 Oct 2020 14:56:55 -0600
From:   Alex Williamson <alex.williamson@...hat.com>
To:     Lu Baolu <baolu.lu@...ux.intel.com>
Cc:     Joerg Roedel <joro@...tes.org>,
        Robin Murphy <robin.murphy@....com>,
        Jean-Philippe Brucker <jean-philippe@...aro.org>,
        Cornelia Huck <cohuck@...hat.com>,
        Kevin Tian <kevin.tian@...el.com>,
        Ashok Raj <ashok.raj@...el.com>,
        Dave Jiang <dave.jiang@...el.com>,
        Liu Yi L <yi.l.liu@...el.com>, Zeng Xin <xin.zeng@...el.com>,
        iommu@...ts.linux-foundation.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        kvm@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v6 4/5] iommu/vt-d: Add iommu_ops support for subdevice
 bus

On Fri, 30 Oct 2020 12:58:08 +0800
Lu Baolu <baolu.lu@...ux.intel.com> wrote:

> +static const struct iommu_ops siov_iommu_ops = {
> +	.capable		= intel_iommu_capable,
> +	.domain_alloc		= siov_iommu_domain_alloc,
> +	.domain_free		= intel_iommu_domain_free,
> +	.attach_dev		= siov_iommu_attach_device,
> +	.detach_dev		= siov_iommu_detach_device,
> +	.map			= intel_iommu_map,
> +	.unmap			= intel_iommu_unmap,
> +	.iova_to_phys		= intel_iommu_iova_to_phys,
> +	.probe_device		= siov_iommu_probe_device,
> +	.release_device		= siov_iommu_release_device,
> +	.get_resv_regions	= siov_iommu_get_resv_regions,
> +	.put_resv_regions	= generic_iommu_put_resv_regions,
> +	.device_group		= generic_device_group,
> +	.pgsize_bitmap		= (~0xFFFUL),
> +};
> +
> +void intel_siov_init(void)
> +{
> +	if (!scalable_mode_support() || !iommu_pasid_support())
> +		return;
> +
> +	bus_set_iommu(&mdev_bus_type, &siov_iommu_ops);
> +	pr_info("Intel(R) Scalable I/O Virtualization supported\n");
> +}

How can you presume to take over iommu_ops for an entire virtual bus?
This also forces mdev and all the dependencies of mdev to be built into
the kernel.  I don't find that acceptable.  Thanks,

Alex