[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20201030034654.15775-3-zhang.lyra@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 30 Oct 2020 11:46:54 +0800
From: Chunyan Zhang <zhang.lyra@...il.com>
To: Ohad Ben-Cohen <ohad@...ery.com>,
Bjorn Andersson <bjorn.andersson@...aro.org>,
Baolin Wang <baolin.wang7@...il.com>
Cc: linux-remoteproc@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Orson Zhai <orsonzhai@...il.com>,
Chunyan Zhang <zhang.lyra@...il.com>,
Chunyan Zhang <chunyan.zhang@...soc.com>
Subject: [PATCH v2 2/2] hwspinlock: sprd: use module_platform_driver() instead postcore initcall
From: Chunyan Zhang <chunyan.zhang@...soc.com>
The hardware spinlock devices are defined in the DT, there's no need for
init calls order, remove boilerplate code by using module_platform_driver.
Signed-off-by: Chunyan Zhang <chunyan.zhang@...soc.com>
---
drivers/hwspinlock/sprd_hwspinlock.c | 13 +------------
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 12 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/hwspinlock/sprd_hwspinlock.c b/drivers/hwspinlock/sprd_hwspinlock.c
index 4c63e2546064..19d1924044e5 100644
--- a/drivers/hwspinlock/sprd_hwspinlock.c
+++ b/drivers/hwspinlock/sprd_hwspinlock.c
@@ -151,18 +151,7 @@ static struct platform_driver sprd_hwspinlock_driver = {
.of_match_table = of_match_ptr(sprd_hwspinlock_of_match),
},
};
-
-static int __init sprd_hwspinlock_init(void)
-{
- return platform_driver_register(&sprd_hwspinlock_driver);
-}
-postcore_initcall(sprd_hwspinlock_init);
-
-static void __exit sprd_hwspinlock_exit(void)
-{
- platform_driver_unregister(&sprd_hwspinlock_driver);
-}
-module_exit(sprd_hwspinlock_exit);
+module_platform_driver(sprd_hwspinlock_driver);
MODULE_LICENSE("GPL v2");
MODULE_DESCRIPTION("Hardware spinlock driver for Spreadtrum");
--
2.20.1
Powered by blists - more mailing lists