[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20201030011738.2028313-5-swboyd@chromium.org>
Date: Thu, 29 Oct 2020 18:17:38 -0700
From: Stephen Boyd <swboyd@...omium.org>
To: Andrzej Hajda <a.hajda@...sung.com>,
Neil Armstrong <narmstrong@...libre.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org,
Douglas Anderson <dianders@...omium.org>,
Laurent Pinchart <Laurent.pinchart@...asonboard.com>,
Jonas Karlman <jonas@...boo.se>,
Jernej Skrabec <jernej.skrabec@...l.net>,
Sean Paul <seanpaul@...omium.org>
Subject: [PATCH v2 4/4] drm/bridge: ti-sn65dsi86: Update reply on aux failures
We should be setting the drm_dp_aux_msg::reply field if a NACK or a
SHORT reply happens. Update the error bit handling logic in
ti_sn_aux_transfer() to handle these cases and notify upper layers that
such errors have happened. This helps the retry logic understand that a
timeout has happened, or to shorten the read length if the panel isn't
able to handle the longest read possible.
Note: I don't have any hardware that exhibits these code paths so this
is written based on reading the datasheet for this bridge and inspecting
the code and how this is called.
Changes in v2:
- Handle WRITE_STATUS_UPDATE properly
Cc: Douglas Anderson <dianders@...omium.org>
Cc: Laurent Pinchart <Laurent.pinchart@...asonboard.com>
Cc: Jonas Karlman <jonas@...boo.se>
Cc: Jernej Skrabec <jernej.skrabec@...l.net>
Cc: Sean Paul <seanpaul@...omium.org>
Signed-off-by: Stephen Boyd <swboyd@...omium.org>
---
drivers/gpu/drm/bridge/ti-sn65dsi86.c | 36 ++++++++++++++++++++++++---
1 file changed, 32 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/bridge/ti-sn65dsi86.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/bridge/ti-sn65dsi86.c
index f86934fd6cc8..984ea41deca8 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/bridge/ti-sn65dsi86.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/bridge/ti-sn65dsi86.c
@@ -873,10 +873,16 @@ static ssize_t ti_sn_aux_transfer(struct drm_dp_aux *aux,
return -EINVAL;
switch (request) {
+ case DP_AUX_I2C_WRITE_STATUS_UPDATE:
+ /* WRITE_STATUS_UPDATE only matters for request_val */
+ request &= ~DP_AUX_I2C_WRITE_STATUS_UPDATE;
+ fallthrough;
case DP_AUX_NATIVE_WRITE:
case DP_AUX_I2C_WRITE:
case DP_AUX_NATIVE_READ:
case DP_AUX_I2C_READ:
+ /* Assume it's good */
+ msg->reply = 0;
break;
default:
return -EINVAL;
@@ -909,10 +915,32 @@ static ssize_t ti_sn_aux_transfer(struct drm_dp_aux *aux,
ret = regmap_read(pdata->regmap, SN_AUX_CMD_STATUS_REG, &val);
if (ret)
return ret;
- else if ((val & AUX_IRQ_STATUS_NAT_I2C_FAIL)
- || (val & AUX_IRQ_STATUS_AUX_RPLY_TOUT)
- || (val & AUX_IRQ_STATUS_AUX_SHORT))
- return -ENXIO;
+
+ if (val & AUX_IRQ_STATUS_AUX_RPLY_TOUT) {
+ /*
+ * The hardware tried the message seven times per the DP spec
+ * but it hit a timeout. We ignore defers here because they're
+ * handled in hardware.
+ */
+ return -ETIMEDOUT;
+ }
+ if (val & AUX_IRQ_STATUS_AUX_SHORT) {
+ ret = regmap_read(pdata->regmap, SN_AUX_LENGTH_REG, &len);
+ if (ret)
+ return ret;
+ } else if (val & AUX_IRQ_STATUS_NAT_I2C_FAIL) {
+ switch (request) {
+ case DP_AUX_I2C_WRITE:
+ case DP_AUX_I2C_READ:
+ msg->reply |= DP_AUX_I2C_REPLY_NACK;
+ break;
+ case DP_AUX_NATIVE_READ:
+ case DP_AUX_NATIVE_WRITE:
+ msg->reply |= DP_AUX_NATIVE_REPLY_NACK;
+ break;
+ }
+ return 0;
+ }
if (request == DP_AUX_NATIVE_WRITE || request == DP_AUX_I2C_WRITE ||
len == 0)
--
Sent by a computer, using git, on the internet
Powered by blists - more mailing lists