[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <87a6w4njbu.fsf@nanos.tec.linutronix.de>
Date: Fri, 30 Oct 2020 10:39:49 +0100
From: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
To: Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de>
Cc: LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, linux-arch@...r.kernel.org,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...uxfoundation.org>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
Paul McKenney <paulmck@...nel.org>,
David Airlie <airlied@...ux.ie>,
Daniel Vetter <daniel@...ll.ch>,
Ard Biesheuvel <ardb@...nel.org>,
Herbert Xu <herbert@...dor.apana.org.au>,
Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de>,
Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@...utronix.de>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>,
Juri Lelli <juri.lelli@...hat.com>,
Vincent Guittot <vincent.guittot@...aro.org>,
Dietmar Eggemann <dietmar.eggemann@....com>,
Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>,
Ben Segall <bsegall@...gle.com>, Mel Gorman <mgorman@...e.de>,
Daniel Bristot de Oliveira <bristot@...hat.com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>, linux-mm@...ck.org,
x86@...nel.org, Vineet Gupta <vgupta@...opsys.com>,
linux-snps-arc@...ts.infradead.org,
Russell King <linux@...linux.org.uk>,
Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, Guo Ren <guoren@...nel.org>,
linux-csky@...r.kernel.org, Michal Simek <monstr@...str.eu>,
Thomas Bogendoerfer <tsbogend@...ha.franken.de>,
linux-mips@...r.kernel.org, Nick Hu <nickhu@...estech.com>,
Greentime Hu <green.hu@...il.com>,
Vincent Chen <deanbo422@...il.com>,
Michael Ellerman <mpe@...erman.id.au>,
Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@...nel.crashing.org>,
Paul Mackerras <paulus@...ba.org>,
linuxppc-dev@...ts.ozlabs.org,
"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
sparclinux@...r.kernel.org, Chris Zankel <chris@...kel.net>,
Max Filippov <jcmvbkbc@...il.com>,
linux-xtensa@...ux-xtensa.org
Subject: Re: [patch V2 00/18] mm/highmem: Preemptible variant of kmap_atomic & friends
On Fri, Oct 30 2020 at 08:25, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 29, 2020 at 11:18:06PM +0100, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
>> - Consolidating all kmap atomic implementations in generic code
>
> I think the consolidation is a winner no matter where we go next. Maybe
> split it out in a prep series so we can get it in ASAP?
Yes, patch 2-15 can just go without any dependency. The only thing which
needs a bit of thought is naming. See the other reply to Linus.
Thanks,
tglx
Powered by blists - more mailing lists