[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <87y2joghw5.fsf@intel.com>
Date: Fri, 30 Oct 2020 11:52:42 +0200
From: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@...ux.intel.com>
To: Deepak R Varma <mh12gx2825@...il.com>,
outreachy-kernel@...glegroups.com,
Zhenyu Wang <zhenyuw@...ux.intel.com>,
Zhi Wang <zhi.a.wang@...el.com>,
Joonas Lahtinen <joonas.lahtinen@...ux.intel.com>,
Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@...el.com>,
David Airlie <airlied@...ux.ie>,
Daniel Vetter <daniel@...ll.ch>,
intel-gvt-dev@...ts.freedesktop.org,
intel-gfx@...ts.freedesktop.org, dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc: mh12gx2825@...il.com, melissa.srw@...il.com, daniel.vetter@...ll.ch
Subject: Re: [PATCH] drm/i915/gvt: use DEFINE_DEBUGFS_ATTRIBUTE with debugfs_create_file_unsafe()
On Fri, 30 Oct 2020, Deepak R Varma <mh12gx2825@...il.com> wrote:
> Using DEFINE_DEBUGFS_ATTRIBUTE macro with debugfs_create_file_unsafe()
> function in place of the debugfs_create_file() function will make the
> file operation struct "reset" aware of the file's lifetime. Additional
> details here: https://lists.archive.carbon60.com/linux/kernel/2369498
Please describe what the functional impact is in the commit message. I
don't understand what 'make the file operation struct "reset" aware of
the file's lifetime' means here.
For referencing LKML posts, please prefer https://lore.kernel.org/.
For referencing commits already in the kernel, please prefer the format
c64688081490 ("debugfs: add support for self-protecting attribute file
fops").
BR,
Jani.
>
> Issue reported by Coccinelle script:
> scripts/coccinelle/api/debugfs/debugfs_simple_attr.cocci
>
> Signed-off-by: Deepak R Varma <mh12gx2825@...il.com>
> ---
> Please Note: This is a Outreachy project task patch.
>
> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gvt/debugfs.c | 9 ++++-----
> 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gvt/debugfs.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gvt/debugfs.c
> index 62e6a14ad58e..18adfa2d5f5b 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gvt/debugfs.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gvt/debugfs.c
> @@ -147,9 +147,8 @@ vgpu_scan_nonprivbb_set(void *data, u64 val)
> return 0;
> }
>
> -DEFINE_SIMPLE_ATTRIBUTE(vgpu_scan_nonprivbb_fops,
> - vgpu_scan_nonprivbb_get, vgpu_scan_nonprivbb_set,
> - "0x%llx\n");
> +DEFINE_DEBUGFS_ATTRIBUTE(vgpu_scan_nonprivbb_fops, vgpu_scan_nonprivbb_get,
> + vgpu_scan_nonprivbb_set, "0x%llx\n");
>
> /**
> * intel_gvt_debugfs_add_vgpu - register debugfs entries for a vGPU
> @@ -165,8 +164,8 @@ void intel_gvt_debugfs_add_vgpu(struct intel_vgpu *vgpu)
> debugfs_create_bool("active", 0444, vgpu->debugfs, &vgpu->active);
> debugfs_create_file("mmio_diff", 0444, vgpu->debugfs, vgpu,
> &vgpu_mmio_diff_fops);
> - debugfs_create_file("scan_nonprivbb", 0644, vgpu->debugfs, vgpu,
> - &vgpu_scan_nonprivbb_fops);
> + debugfs_create_file_unsafe("scan_nonprivbb", 0644, vgpu->debugfs, vgpu,
> + &vgpu_scan_nonprivbb_fops);
> }
>
> /**
--
Jani Nikula, Intel Open Source Graphics Center
Powered by blists - more mailing lists