linux-kernel - Re: [External] Re: [PATCH v2 00/19] Free some vmemmap pages of hugetlb page

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CAMZfGtUoEeJTBYwxYjWJEreHefcO81WhhnvRO7vTb_k+zPCHrg@mail.gmail.com>
Date:   Fri, 30 Oct 2020 18:24:25 +0800
From:   Muchun Song <songmuchun@...edance.com>
To:     Michal Hocko <mhocko@...e.com>
Cc:     Jonathan Corbet <corbet@....net>,
        Mike Kravetz <mike.kravetz@...cle.com>,
        Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>, mingo@...hat.com,
        bp@...en8.de, x86@...nel.org, hpa@...or.com,
        dave.hansen@...ux.intel.com, luto@...nel.org,
        Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>, viro@...iv.linux.org.uk,
        Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>, paulmck@...nel.org,
        mchehab+huawei@...nel.org, pawan.kumar.gupta@...ux.intel.com,
        Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@...radead.org>, oneukum@...e.com,
        anshuman.khandual@....com, jroedel@...e.de,
        Mina Almasry <almasrymina@...gle.com>,
        David Rientjes <rientjes@...gle.com>,
        Matthew Wilcox <willy@...radead.org>,
        Xiongchun duan <duanxiongchun@...edance.com>,
        linux-doc@...r.kernel.org, LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        Linux Memory Management List <linux-mm@...ck.org>,
        linux-fsdevel <linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [External] Re: [PATCH v2 00/19] Free some vmemmap pages of
 hugetlb page

On Fri, Oct 30, 2020 at 5:14 PM Michal Hocko <mhocko@...e.com> wrote:
>
> On Mon 26-10-20 22:50:55, Muchun Song wrote:
> > If we uses the 1G hugetlbpage, we can save 4095 pages. This is a very
> > substantial gain. On our server, run some SPDK/QEMU applications which
> > will use 1000GB hugetlbpage. With this feature enabled, we can save
> > ~16GB(1G hugepage)/~11GB(2MB hugepage) memory.
> [...]
> >  15 files changed, 1091 insertions(+), 165 deletions(-)
> >  create mode 100644 include/linux/bootmem_info.h
> >  create mode 100644 mm/bootmem_info.c
>
> This is a neat idea but the code footprint is really non trivial. To a
> very tricky code which hugetlb is unfortunately.
>
> Saving 1,6% of memory is definitely interesting especially for 1GB pages
> which tend to be more static and where the savings are more visible.
>
> Anyway, I haven't seen any runtime overhead analysis here. What is the
> price to modify the vmemmap page tables and make them pte rather than
> pmd based (especially for 2MB hugetlb). Also, how expensive is the
> vmemmap page tables reconstruction on the freeing path?

Yeah, I haven't tested the remapping overhead of reserving a hugetlb
page. I can do that. But the overhead is not on the allocation/freeing of
each hugetlb page, it is only once when we reserve some hugetlb pages
through /proc/sys/vm/nr_hugepages. Once the reservation is successful,
the subsequent allocation, freeing and using are the same as before
(not patched). So I think that the overhead is acceptable.

Thanks.

>
> Thanks!
> --
> Michal Hocko
> SUSE Labs



-- 
Yours,
Muchun