[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20201030103220.GH2611@hirez.programming.kicks-ass.net>
Date: Fri, 30 Oct 2020 11:32:20 +0100
From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
To: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
Cc: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>, kan.liang@...ux.intel.com,
like.xu@...ux.intel.com
Subject: Re: [BUG] Stack overflow when running perf and function tracer
On Fri, Oct 30, 2020 at 11:26:01AM +0100, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
> > The only thing I can come up with in a hurry is that that dummy_iregs
> > thing really should be static. That's 168 bytes of stack out the window
> > right there.
>
> What's worse is perf_sample_data which is 384 bytes and is 64 bytes aligned.
Urgh, that thing just keeps on growing :/
I'll try and have a look if we can both shrink the thing and move it off
stack.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists