linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v4 00/15] Audio graph card updates and usage with Tegra210 audio

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20201030135820.GD4405@sirena.org.uk>
Date:   Fri, 30 Oct 2020 13:58:20 +0000
From:   Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>
To:     Sameer Pujar <spujar@...dia.com>
Cc:     lgirdwood@...il.com, robh+dt@...nel.org,
        kuninori.morimoto.gx@...esas.com,
        pierre-louis.bossart@...ux.intel.com, perex@...ex.cz,
        tiwai@...e.com, p.zabel@...gutronix.de, thierry.reding@...il.com,
        jonathanh@...dia.com, alsa-devel@...a-project.org,
        devicetree@...r.kernel.org, linux-tegra@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, sharadg@...dia.com,
        mkumard@...dia.com, viswanathl@...dia.com, rlokhande@...dia.com,
        dramesh@...dia.com, atalambedu@...dia.com, nwartikar@...dia.com,
        swarren@...dia.com, nicoleotsuka@...il.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 00/15] Audio graph card updates and usage with
 Tegra210 audio

On Fri, Oct 30, 2020 at 12:04:50PM +0530, Sameer Pujar wrote:
> Hi Mark, Morimoto-san,

> > Sameer Pujar (15):
> >    ASoC: soc-core: Fix component name_prefix parsing
> >    ASoC: soc-pcm: Get all BEs along DAPM path
> >    ASoC: audio-graph: Use of_node and DAI for DPCM DAI link names
> >    ASoC: audio-graph: Identify 'no_pcm' DAI links for DPCM
> >    ASoC: audio-graph: Support empty Codec endpoint
> >    ASoC: audio-graph: Expose new members for asoc_simple_priv
> >    ASoC: audio-graph: Expose helpers from audio graph

> Would you suggest to keep above in a separate series and thus not blocked by
> below doc updates? If so do I need to resend above in a next revision or if
> these are good to be picked up?

It's probably better to split things up given that the dependencies for
the last bit are on another series.

Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (489 bytes)