[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20201030143002.535531-1-colin.king@canonical.com>
Date: Fri, 30 Oct 2020 14:30:02 +0000
From: Colin King <colin.king@...onical.com>
To: Nehal Shah <nehal-bakulchandra.shah@....com>,
Sandeep Singh <sandeep.singh@....com>,
Jiri Kosina <jikos@...nel.org>,
Benjamin Tissoires <benjamin.tissoires@...hat.com>,
linux-input@...r.kernel.org
Cc: kernel-janitors@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH][next] SFH: fix error return check for -ERESTARTSYS
From: Colin Ian King <colin.king@...onical.com>
Currently the check for the error return code -ERESTARTSYS is dead code
and never executed because a previous check for ret < 0 is catching this
and returning -ETIMEDOUT instead. Fix this by checking for -ERESTARTSYS
before the more generic negative error code.
Addresses-Coverity: ("Logically dead code")
Fixes: 4b2c53d93a4b ("SFH:Transport Driver to add support of AMD Sensor Fusion Hub (SFH)")
Signed-off-by: Colin Ian King <colin.king@...onical.com>
---
drivers/hid/amd-sfh-hid/amd_sfh_hid.c | 6 +++---
1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/hid/amd-sfh-hid/amd_sfh_hid.c b/drivers/hid/amd-sfh-hid/amd_sfh_hid.c
index a471079a3bd0..4f989483aa03 100644
--- a/drivers/hid/amd-sfh-hid/amd_sfh_hid.c
+++ b/drivers/hid/amd-sfh-hid/amd_sfh_hid.c
@@ -88,10 +88,10 @@ static int amdtp_wait_for_response(struct hid_device *hid)
ret = wait_event_interruptible_timeout(hid_data->hid_wait,
cli_data->request_done[i],
msecs_to_jiffies(AMD_SFH_RESPONSE_TIMEOUT));
- if (ret < 0)
- return -ETIMEDOUT;
- else if (ret == -ERESTARTSYS)
+ if (ret == -ERESTARTSYS)
return -ERESTARTSYS;
+ else if (ret < 0)
+ return -ETIMEDOUT;
else
return 0;
}
--
2.27.0
Powered by blists - more mailing lists