[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20201030145322.agt774ib5jgin7du@Rk>
Date: Fri, 30 Oct 2020 22:53:22 +0800
From: Coiby Xu <coiby.xu@...il.com>
To: Chunyan Zhang <zhang.lyra@...il.com>
Cc: Lee Jones <lee.jones@...aro.org>, Orson Zhai <orsonzhai@...il.com>,
Baolin Wang <baolin.wang7@...il.com>,
open list <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 9/9] mfd: sprd-sc27xx-spi: remove unnecessary
CONFIG_PM_SLEEP
Hi Chunyan,
On Fri, Oct 30, 2020 at 12:02:03PM +0800, Chunyan Zhang wrote:
>Hi Coiby,
>
>After removing CONFIG_PM_SLEEP, sprd_pmic_suspend/resume() would not
>be built into symbol table with clang compiler though, that would
>cause clang compiler report warnings of "unused function" if
>CONFIG_PM_SLEEP is not set. So I also prefer to add a __maybe_unused
>instead as other people suggested in the mail list.
>
Thank you for the suggestion! At least Lee prefers to CONFIG_PM_SLEEP
thus to keep the status quo. I'll see he'll change his mind with the
ongoing discussion [1]:)
[1] https://www.mail-archive.com/linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org/msg2361371.html
>Thanks,
>Chunyan
>
>
>On Thu, 29 Oct 2020 at 18:07, Coiby Xu <coiby.xu@...il.com> wrote:
>>
>> SIMPLE_DEV_PM_OPS has already took good care of CONFIG_PM_CONFIG. Signed-off-by: Coiby Xu <coiby.xu@...il.com> drivers/mfd/sprd-sc27xx-spi.c | 2 -- 1 file changed, 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/drivers/mfd/sprd-sc27xx-spi.c b/drivers/mfd/sprd-sc27xx-spi.c index 6b7956604a0f..4db2ec9ef2ff 100644 --- a/drivers/mfd/sprd-sc27xx-spi.c +++ b/drivers/mfd/sprd-sc27xx-spi.c @@ -206,7 +206,6 @@ static int sprd_pmic_probe(struct spi_device *spi) return 0; -#ifdef CONFIG_PM_SLEEP static int sprd_pmic_suspend(struct device *dev) struct sprd_pmic *ddata = dev_get_drvdata(dev); @@ -226,7 +225,6 @@ static int sprd_pmic_resume(struct device *dev) return 0; -#endif static SIMPLE_DEV_PM_OPS(sprd_pmic_pm_ops, sprd_pmic_suspend, sprd_pmic_resume); 2.28.0
--
Best regards,
Coiby
Powered by blists - more mailing lists