| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-ID: <20201030151955.258178461@infradead.org>
Date: Fri, 30 Oct 2020 16:13:50 +0100
From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
To: mingo@...nel.org, tglx@...utronix.de, rostedt@...dmis.org
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, kan.liang@...ux.intel.com,
acme@...nel.org, mark.rutland@....com,
alexander.shishkin@...ux.intel.com, jolsa@...hat.com,
namhyung@...nel.org, ak@...ux.intel.com, eranian@...gle.com,
peterz@...radead.org
Subject: [PATCH 5/6] perf/arch: Remove perf_sample_data::regs_user_copy
struct perf_sample_data lives on-stack, we should be careful about it's
size. Furthermore, the pt_regs copy in there is only because x86_64 is a
trainwreck, solve it differently.
Reported-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@...radead.org>
Tested-by: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>
---
arch/arm/kernel/perf_regs.c | 3 +--
arch/arm64/kernel/perf_regs.c | 3 +--
arch/csky/kernel/perf_regs.c | 3 +--
arch/powerpc/perf/perf_regs.c | 3 +--
arch/riscv/kernel/perf_regs.c | 3 +--
arch/s390/kernel/perf_regs.c | 3 +--
arch/x86/kernel/perf_regs.c | 15 +++++++++++----
include/linux/perf_event.h | 6 ------
include/linux/perf_regs.h | 6 ++----
kernel/events/core.c | 8 +++-----
10 files changed, 22 insertions(+), 31 deletions(-)
--- a/arch/arm/kernel/perf_regs.c
+++ b/arch/arm/kernel/perf_regs.c
@@ -32,8 +32,7 @@ u64 perf_reg_abi(struct task_struct *tas
}
void perf_get_regs_user(struct perf_regs *regs_user,
- struct pt_regs *regs,
- struct pt_regs *regs_user_copy)
+ struct pt_regs *regs)
{
regs_user->regs = task_pt_regs(current);
regs_user->abi = perf_reg_abi(current);
--- a/arch/arm64/kernel/perf_regs.c
+++ b/arch/arm64/kernel/perf_regs.c
@@ -73,8 +73,7 @@ u64 perf_reg_abi(struct task_struct *tas
}
void perf_get_regs_user(struct perf_regs *regs_user,
- struct pt_regs *regs,
- struct pt_regs *regs_user_copy)
+ struct pt_regs *regs)
{
regs_user->regs = task_pt_regs(current);
regs_user->abi = perf_reg_abi(current);
--- a/arch/csky/kernel/perf_regs.c
+++ b/arch/csky/kernel/perf_regs.c
@@ -32,8 +32,7 @@ u64 perf_reg_abi(struct task_struct *tas
}
void perf_get_regs_user(struct perf_regs *regs_user,
- struct pt_regs *regs,
- struct pt_regs *regs_user_copy)
+ struct pt_regs *regs)
{
regs_user->regs = task_pt_regs(current);
regs_user->abi = perf_reg_abi(current);
--- a/arch/powerpc/perf/perf_regs.c
+++ b/arch/powerpc/perf/perf_regs.c
@@ -144,8 +144,7 @@ u64 perf_reg_abi(struct task_struct *tas
}
void perf_get_regs_user(struct perf_regs *regs_user,
- struct pt_regs *regs,
- struct pt_regs *regs_user_copy)
+ struct pt_regs *regs)
{
regs_user->regs = task_pt_regs(current);
regs_user->abi = (regs_user->regs) ? perf_reg_abi(current) :
--- a/arch/riscv/kernel/perf_regs.c
+++ b/arch/riscv/kernel/perf_regs.c
@@ -36,8 +36,7 @@ u64 perf_reg_abi(struct task_struct *tas
}
void perf_get_regs_user(struct perf_regs *regs_user,
- struct pt_regs *regs,
- struct pt_regs *regs_user_copy)
+ struct pt_regs *regs)
{
regs_user->regs = task_pt_regs(current);
regs_user->abi = perf_reg_abi(current);
--- a/arch/s390/kernel/perf_regs.c
+++ b/arch/s390/kernel/perf_regs.c
@@ -53,8 +53,7 @@ u64 perf_reg_abi(struct task_struct *tas
}
void perf_get_regs_user(struct perf_regs *regs_user,
- struct pt_regs *regs,
- struct pt_regs *regs_user_copy)
+ struct pt_regs *regs)
{
/*
* Use the regs from the first interruption and let
--- a/arch/x86/kernel/perf_regs.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kernel/perf_regs.c
@@ -101,8 +101,7 @@ u64 perf_reg_abi(struct task_struct *tas
}
void perf_get_regs_user(struct perf_regs *regs_user,
- struct pt_regs *regs,
- struct pt_regs *regs_user_copy)
+ struct pt_regs *regs)
{
regs_user->regs = task_pt_regs(current);
regs_user->abi = perf_reg_abi(current);
@@ -129,12 +128,20 @@ u64 perf_reg_abi(struct task_struct *tas
return PERF_SAMPLE_REGS_ABI_64;
}
+static DEFINE_PER_CPU(struct pt_regs, nmi_user_regs);
+
void perf_get_regs_user(struct perf_regs *regs_user,
- struct pt_regs *regs,
- struct pt_regs *regs_user_copy)
+ struct pt_regs *regs)
{
+ struct pt_regs *regs_user_copy = this_cpu_ptr(&nmi_user_regs);
struct pt_regs *user_regs = task_pt_regs(current);
+ if (!in_nmi()) {
+ regs_user->regs = user_regs;
+ regs_user->abi = perf_reg_abi(current);
+ return;
+ }
+
/*
* If we're in an NMI that interrupted task_pt_regs setup, then
* we can't sample user regs at all. This check isn't really
--- a/include/linux/perf_event.h
+++ b/include/linux/perf_event.h
@@ -1022,13 +1022,7 @@ struct perf_sample_data {
struct perf_callchain_entry *callchain;
u64 aux_size;
- /*
- * regs_user may point to task_pt_regs or to regs_user_copy, depending
- * on arch details.
- */
struct perf_regs regs_user;
- struct pt_regs regs_user_copy;
-
struct perf_regs regs_intr;
u64 stack_user_size;
--- a/include/linux/perf_regs.h
+++ b/include/linux/perf_regs.h
@@ -20,8 +20,7 @@ u64 perf_reg_value(struct pt_regs *regs,
int perf_reg_validate(u64 mask);
u64 perf_reg_abi(struct task_struct *task);
void perf_get_regs_user(struct perf_regs *regs_user,
- struct pt_regs *regs,
- struct pt_regs *regs_user_copy);
+ struct pt_regs *regs);
#else
#define PERF_REG_EXTENDED_MASK 0
@@ -42,8 +41,7 @@ static inline u64 perf_reg_abi(struct ta
}
static inline void perf_get_regs_user(struct perf_regs *regs_user,
- struct pt_regs *regs,
- struct pt_regs *regs_user_copy)
+ struct pt_regs *regs);
{
regs_user->regs = task_pt_regs(current);
regs_user->abi = perf_reg_abi(current);
--- a/kernel/events/core.c
+++ b/kernel/events/core.c
@@ -6374,14 +6374,13 @@ perf_output_sample_regs(struct perf_outp
}
static void perf_sample_regs_user(struct perf_regs *regs_user,
- struct pt_regs *regs,
- struct pt_regs *regs_user_copy)
+ struct pt_regs *regs)
{
if (user_mode(regs)) {
regs_user->abi = perf_reg_abi(current);
regs_user->regs = regs;
} else if (!(current->flags & PF_KTHREAD)) {
- perf_get_regs_user(regs_user, regs, regs_user_copy);
+ perf_get_regs_user(regs_user, regs);
} else {
regs_user->abi = PERF_SAMPLE_REGS_ABI_NONE;
regs_user->regs = NULL;
@@ -7083,8 +7082,7 @@ void perf_prepare_sample(struct perf_eve
}
if (sample_type & (PERF_SAMPLE_REGS_USER | PERF_SAMPLE_STACK_USER))
- perf_sample_regs_user(&data->regs_user, regs,
- &data->regs_user_copy);
+ perf_sample_regs_user(&data->regs_user, regs);
if (sample_type & PERF_SAMPLE_REGS_USER) {
/* regs dump ABI info */
Powered by blists - more mailing lists