[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <db82e52c-0159-777d-8fa9-7b5cf93eca7f@redhat.com>
Date: Sat, 31 Oct 2020 11:05:45 +0100
From: David Hildenbrand <david@...hat.com>
To: Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org>,
Mike Rapoport <rppt@...nel.org>
Cc: Sudarshan Rajagopalan <sudaraja@...eaurora.org>,
Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>,
Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@....com>,
Anshuman Khandual <anshuman.khandual@....com>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Steven Price <steven.price@....com>,
Suren Baghdasaryan <surenb@...gle.com>,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...gle.com>,
Will Deacon <will@...nel.org>,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
Pratik Patel <pratikp@...eaurora.org>
Subject: Re: mm/memblock: export memblock_{start/end}_of_DRAM
On 31.10.20 10:18, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> On Fri, Oct 30, 2020 at 10:38:42AM +0200, Mike Rapoport wrote:
>>
>> What do you mean by "system memory block"? There could be a lot of
>> interpretations if you take into account memory hotplug, "mem=" option,
>> reserved and firmware memory.
>>
>> I'd suggest you to describe the entire use case in more detail. Having
>> the complete picture would help finding a proper solution.
>
> I think we need the code for the driver trying to do this as an RFC
> submission. Everything else is rather pointless.
Sharing RFCs is most probably not what people want when developing
advanced hypervisor features :)
@Sudarshan, I recommend looking at the slides of the KVM Forum talk from
yesterday
https://kvmforum2020.sched.com/event/eE40/towards-an-alternative-memory-architecture-joao-martins-oracle?iframe=no
It contains a nice summary of the state of art, and how "mem=", devdax,
and dax_hmat can be used to tackle the issue in a hypervisor.
--
Thanks,
David / dhildenb
Powered by blists - more mailing lists