lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:   Sat, 31 Oct 2020 09:00:49 -0600
From:   Jens Axboe <>
To:     Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <>,
        Sagi Grimberg <>
Cc:     Christoph Hellwig <>,,
        Thomas Gleixner <>,
        David Runge <>,,,
        Peter Zijlstra <>,
        Daniel Wagner <>, Mike Galbraith <>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/3] blk-mq: Use llist_head for blk_cpu_done

On 10/31/20 4:41 AM, Sebastian Andrzej Siewior wrote:
> On 2020-10-29 14:07:59 [-0700], Sagi Grimberg wrote:
>>> in which context?
>> Not sure what is the question.
> The question is in which context do you complete your requests. My guess
> by now is "usually softirq/NAPI and context in rare error case".

There really aren't any rules for this, and it's perfectly legit to
complete from process context. Maybe you're a kthread driven driver and
that's how you handle completions. The block completion path has always
been hard IRQ safe, but possible to call from anywhere.

Jens Axboe

Powered by blists - more mailing lists