[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20201031130546.d2b94345008e807f548dc068@linux-foundation.org>
Date: Sat, 31 Oct 2020 13:05:46 -0700
From: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
To: Anand K Mistry <amistry@...gle.com>
Cc: linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org, asteinhauser@...gle.com,
joelaf@...gle.com, tglx@...utronix.de,
Alexey Dobriyan <adobriyan@...il.com>,
Alexey Gladkov <gladkov.alexey@...il.com>,
Jonathan Corbet <corbet@....net>,
Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>,
Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab+huawei@...nel.org>,
Michal Hocko <mhocko@...e.com>,
Mike Rapoport <rppt@...nel.org>, NeilBrown <neilb@...e.de>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
linux-doc@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] proc: Provide details on indirect branch speculation
On Fri, 30 Oct 2020 17:27:54 +1100 Anand K Mistry <amistry@...gle.com> wrote:
> Similar to speculation store bypass, show information about the indirect
> branch speculation mode of a task in /proc/$pid/status.
Why is this considered useful?
Powered by blists - more mailing lists