lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAFLxGvxB3-ryVLPtS0XhZnu+4w-gSzzw=BV+1mKTGt3mOKbeiw@mail.gmail.com>
Date:   Sat, 31 Oct 2020 21:44:12 +0100
From:   Richard Weinberger <richard.weinberger@...il.com>
To:     Chengsong Ke <kechengsong@...wei.com>
Cc:     Richard Weinberger <richard@....at>,
        Sascha Hauer <s.hauer@...gutronix.de>,
        linux-mtd@...ts.infradead.org, LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        wangfangpeng1@...wei.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] ubifs: Fix the printing type of c->big_lpt

On Sat, Oct 31, 2020 at 9:56 AM Chengsong Ke <kechengsong@...wei.com> wrote:
>
> Ubifs uses %d to print c->big_lpt, but c->big_lpt is a variable
> of type unsigned int and should be printed with %u.

Well, it is:
unsigned int big_lpt:1;
So, either 0 or 1.

Does changing it to %u silence some static checker or is there some
other problem I don't
see right now? :-)

Thanks,
//richard

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ