linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH net-next] net: dlci: Deprecate the DLCI driver (aka the Frame Relay layer)

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CAJht_EO0Wp=TVdLZ_8XK7ShXTUAmX-wb0UssTtn51DkPE266yQ@mail.gmail.com>
Date:   Sat, 31 Oct 2020 16:35:29 -0700
From:   Xie He <xie.he.0141@...il.com>
To:     Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...nel.org>
Cc:     Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>, Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>,
        "David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
        Linux Kernel Network Developers <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
        LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        Lee Jones <lee.jones@...aro.org>,
        "Gustavo A. R. Silva" <gustavoars@...nel.org>,
        Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@...nel.org>,
        Krzysztof Halasa <khc@...waw.pl>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next] net: dlci: Deprecate the DLCI driver (aka the
 Frame Relay layer)

On Sat, Oct 31, 2020 at 2:41 PM Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...nel.org> wrote:
>
> I think it can just go in the bin directly. I actually submitted a couple of
> patches to clean up drivers/net/wan last year but didn't follow up
> with a new version after we decided that x.25 is still needed, see
> https://lore.kernel.org/netdev/20191209151256.2497534-1-arnd@arndb.de/
>
> I can resubmit if you like.

Should we also remove the two macro definitions in
"include/uapi/linux/sockios.h" (SIOCADDDLCI / SIOCDELDLCI), too? It
seems to be not included in your original patch.