[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20201031031053.25264-1-yuehaibing@huawei.com>
Date: Sat, 31 Oct 2020 11:10:53 +0800
From: YueHaibing <yuehaibing@...wei.com>
To: <linux@...linux.org.uk>, <andrew@...n.ch>, <hkallweit1@...il.com>,
<davem@...emloft.net>, <kuba@...nel.org>
CC: <netdev@...r.kernel.org>, <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
YueHaibing <yuehaibing@...wei.com>
Subject: [PATCH] sfp: Fix error handing in sfp_probe()
gpiod_to_irq() never return 0, but returns negative in
case of error, check it and set gpio_irq to 0.
Fixes: 73970055450e ("sfp: add SFP module support")
Signed-off-by: YueHaibing <yuehaibing@...wei.com>
---
drivers/net/phy/sfp.c | 3 ++-
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/drivers/net/phy/sfp.c b/drivers/net/phy/sfp.c
index 1d18c10e8f82..34aa196b7465 100644
--- a/drivers/net/phy/sfp.c
+++ b/drivers/net/phy/sfp.c
@@ -2389,7 +2389,8 @@ static int sfp_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
continue;
sfp->gpio_irq[i] = gpiod_to_irq(sfp->gpio[i]);
- if (!sfp->gpio_irq[i]) {
+ if (sfp->gpio_irq[i] < 0) {
+ sfp->gpio_irq[i] = 0;
sfp->need_poll = true;
continue;
}
--
2.17.1
Powered by blists - more mailing lists