[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <c2708b32-e7f5-dae9-63d5-a35c97f25ea7@intel.com>
Date: Sat, 31 Oct 2020 13:35:28 +0800
From: Xiaochen Shen <xiaochen.shen@...el.com>
To: Reinette Chatre <reinette.chatre@...el.com>,
"tglx@...utronix.de" <tglx@...utronix.de>,
"mingo@...hat.com" <mingo@...hat.com>,
"bp@...en8.de" <bp@...en8.de>, "hpa@...or.com" <hpa@...or.com>,
"Luck, Tony" <tony.luck@...el.com>,
"Yu, Fenghua" <fenghua.yu@...el.com>,
"willemb@...gle.com" <willemb@...gle.com>
Cc: "x86@...nel.org" <x86@...nel.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"Jia, Pei P" <pei.p.jia@...el.com>,
Xiaochen Shen <xiaochen.shen@...el.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/3] Fix kernfs node reference count leak issues
Hi Reinette,
Thank you for correcting this!
The subject of this "cover letter" should be:
x86/resctrl: Fix kernfs node reference count leak issues
On 10/31/2020 5:18, Reinette Chatre wrote:
> Apologies, the Subject intended to have a "x86/resctrl:" prefix.
>
> On 10/30/2020 12:02 PM, Xiaochen Shen wrote:
>> Fix several kernfs node reference count leak issues:
>> (1) Remove superfluous kernfs_get() calls to prevent refcount leak
>> (2) Add necessary kernfs_put() calls to prevent refcount leak
>> (3) Follow-up cleanup for the change in previous patch.
>>
>> Xiaochen Shen (3):
>> x86/resctrl: Remove superfluous kernfs_get() calls to prevent refcount
>> leak
>> x86/resctrl: Add necessary kernfs_put() calls to prevent refcount leak
>> x86/resctrl: Clean up unused function parameter in rmdir path
>>
>> arch/x86/kernel/cpu/resctrl/rdtgroup.c | 82 ++++++++++++++--------------------
>> 1 file changed, 33 insertions(+), 49 deletions(-)
>>
--
Best regards,
Xiaochen
Powered by blists - more mailing lists