[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAPcyv4h8O+boTo-MpGRSC8RpjrsvU-P3AU7_kwbrfDkEp8bH1w@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 2 Nov 2020 10:38:28 -0800
From: Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@...el.com>
To: Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@...dia.com>
Cc: Dave Jiang <dave.jiang@...el.com>,
"Raj, Ashok" <ashok.raj@...el.com>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Vinod Koul <vkoul@...nel.org>,
"Dey, Megha" <megha.dey@...el.com>, maz@...nel.org,
Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@...gle.com>,
Alex Williamson <alex.williamson@...hat.com>,
Jacob jun Pan <jacob.jun.pan@...el.com>,
Yi L Liu <yi.l.liu@...el.com>, Baolu Lu <baolu.lu@...el.com>,
"Tian, Kevin" <kevin.tian@...el.com>,
Sanjay K Kumar <sanjay.k.kumar@...el.com>,
"Luck, Tony" <tony.luck@...el.com>, Jing Lin <jing.lin@...el.com>,
kwankhede@...dia.com, eric.auger@...hat.com,
Parav Pandit <parav@...lanox.com>,
"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael@...nel.org>, netanelg@...lanox.com,
shahafs@...lanox.com, yan.y.zhao@...ux.intel.com,
Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@...hat.com>,
Samuel Ortiz <samuel.ortiz@...el.com>,
Mona Hossain <mona.hossain@...el.com>,
Megha Dey <megha.dey@...ux.intel.com>,
dmaengine@...r.kernel.org,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Linux PCI <linux-pci@...r.kernel.org>,
KVM list <kvm@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 00/17] Add VFIO mediated device support and DEV-MSI
support for the idxd driver
On Mon, Nov 2, 2020 at 10:26 AM Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@...dia.com> wrote:
>
> On Mon, Nov 02, 2020 at 11:18:33AM -0700, Dave Jiang wrote:
> >
> >
> > On 11/2/2020 10:19 AM, Jason Gunthorpe wrote:
> > > On Mon, Nov 02, 2020 at 08:20:43AM -0800, Raj, Ashok wrote:
> > > > Creating these private interfaces for intra-module are just 1-1 and not
> > > > general purpose and every accelerator needs to create these instances.
> > >
> > > This is where we are going, auxillary bus should be merged soon which
> > > is specifically to connect these kinds of devices across subsystems
> >
> > I think this resolves the aux device probe/remove issue via a common bus.
> > But it does not help with the mdev device needing a lot of the device
> > handling calls from the parent driver as it share the same handling as the
> > parent device.
>
> The intention of auxiliary bus is that the two parts will tightly
> couple across some exported function interface.
>
> > My plan is to export all the needed call via EXPORT_SYMBOL_NS() so
> > the calls can be shared in its own namespace between the modules. Do
> > you have any objection with that?
>
> I think you will be the first to use the namespace stuff for this, it
> seems like a good idea and others should probably do so as well.
I was thinking either EXPORT_SYMBOL_NS, or auxiliary bus, because you
should be able to export an ops structure with all the necessary
callbacks. Aux bus seems cleaner because the lifetime rules and
ownership concerns are clearer.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists