lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <510543c4-0abe-7582-32cd-404656e818d8@linux.intel.com>
Date:   Mon, 2 Nov 2020 13:03:46 -0800
From:   "Kuppuswamy, Sathyanarayanan" 
        <sathyanarayanan.kuppuswamy@...ux.intel.com>
To:     Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com>,
        linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org,
        Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc:     Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@...gle.com>, linux-pci@...r.kernel.org,
        "Rafael J . Wysocki" <rafael.j.wysocki@...el.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 5/6] PCI/ACPI: Replace open coded variant of
 resource_union()



On 11/2/20 1:00 PM, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
> Since we have resource_union() helper, let's utilize it here.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com>
> Cc: Kuppuswamy Sathyanarayanan <sathyanarayanan.kuppuswamy@...ux.intel.com>
> Cc: Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@...gle.com>
> Cc: linux-pci@...r.kernel.org
> Reviewed-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@...el.com>
Reviewed-by: Kuppuswamy Sathyanarayanan <sathyanarayanan.kuppuswamy@...ux.intel.com>
> ---
>   drivers/acpi/pci_root.c | 4 +---
>   1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 3 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/acpi/pci_root.c b/drivers/acpi/pci_root.c
> index c12b5fb3e8fb..0bf072cef6cf 100644
> --- a/drivers/acpi/pci_root.c
> +++ b/drivers/acpi/pci_root.c
> @@ -722,9 +722,7 @@ static void acpi_pci_root_validate_resources(struct device *dev,
>   			 * our resources no longer match the ACPI _CRS, but
>   			 * the kernel resource tree doesn't allow overlaps.
>   			 */
> -			if (resource_overlaps(res1, res2)) {
> -				res2->start = min(res1->start, res2->start);
> -				res2->end = max(res1->end, res2->end);
> +			if (resource_union(res1, res2, res2)) {
>   				dev_info(dev, "host bridge window expanded to %pR; %pR ignored\n",
>   					 res2, res1);
>   				free = true;
> 

-- 
Sathyanarayanan Kuppuswamy
Linux Kernel Developer

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ