[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <8566b27c-2f71-16f8-1b9a-b1b79015f4d2@linux.ibm.com>
Date: Mon, 2 Nov 2020 12:21:57 +0530
From: kajoljain <kjain@...ux.ibm.com>
To: trix@...hat.com, maximlevitsky@...il.com, oakad@...oo.com,
ulf.hansson@...aro.org
Cc: linux-mmc@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] memstick: mspro_block: remove unneeded semicolon
On 10/31/20 7:18 PM, trix@...hat.com wrote:
> From: Tom Rix <trix@...hat.com>
>
> A semicolon is not needed after a switch statement.
Hi Tom,
I was checking this patch. Not sure if it will come under as fix patch. Since this is not fixing
any logical issue do we still need to add fix tag?
Thanks,
Kajol Jain
>
> Signed-off-by: Tom Rix <trix@...hat.com>
> ---
> drivers/memstick/core/mspro_block.c | 2 +-
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/memstick/core/mspro_block.c b/drivers/memstick/core/mspro_block.c
> index cd6b8d4f2335..afb892e7ffc6 100644
> --- a/drivers/memstick/core/mspro_block.c
> +++ b/drivers/memstick/core/mspro_block.c
> @@ -276,7 +276,7 @@ static const char *mspro_block_attr_name(unsigned char tag)
> return "attr_devinfo";
> default:
> return NULL;
> - };
> + }
> }
>
> typedef ssize_t (*sysfs_show_t)(struct device *dev,
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists