lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20201102123841.39eb4216@canb.auug.org.au>
Date:   Mon, 2 Nov 2020 12:38:41 +1100
From:   Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>
To:     Helge Deller <deller@....de>,
        Parisc List <linux-parisc@...r.kernel.org>,
        Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>
Cc:     Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        Linux Next Mailing List <linux-next@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: linux-next: manual merge of the parisc-hd tree with the asm-generic
 tree

Hi all,

Today's linux-next merge of the parisc-hd tree got a conflict in:

  arch/parisc/kernel/time.c

between commit:

  686092e7daaa ("parisc: use legacy_timer_tick")

from the asm-generic tree and commit:

  3b7ab4a74a2d ("parisc: Switch to clockevent based timers")

from the parisc-hd tree.

I fixed it up (I effectively reverted the former commit) and can carry the
fix as necessary. This is now fixed as far as linux-next is concerned,
but any non trivial conflicts should be mentioned to your upstream
maintainer when your tree is submitted for merging.  You may also want
to consider cooperating with the maintainer of the conflicting tree to
minimise any particularly complex conflicts.

-- 
Cheers,
Stephen Rothwell

Content of type "application/pgp-signature" skipped

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ