[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20201102092754.GD22613@dhcp22.suse.cz>
Date: Mon, 2 Nov 2020 10:27:54 +0100
From: Michal Hocko <mhocko@...e.com>
To: kernel test robot <rong.a.chen@...el.com>
Cc: Waiman Long <longman@...hat.com>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Shakeel Butt <shakeelb@...gle.com>,
Chris Down <chris@...isdown.name>,
Johannes Weiner <hannes@...xchg.org>,
Roman Gushchin <guro@...com>, Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>,
Vladimir Davydov <vdavydov.dev@...il.com>,
Yafang Shao <laoar.shao@...il.com>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, lkp@...ts.01.org,
lkp@...el.com, ying.huang@...el.com, feng.tang@...el.com,
zhengjun.xing@...el.com
Subject: Re: [mm/memcg] bd0b230fe1: will-it-scale.per_process_ops -22.7%
regression
On Mon 02-11-20 17:15:43, kernel test robot wrote:
> Greeting,
>
> FYI, we noticed a -22.7% regression of will-it-scale.per_process_ops due to commit:
>
>
> commit: bd0b230fe14554bfffbae54e19038716f96f5a41 ("mm/memcg: unify swap and memsw page counters")
> https://git.kernel.org/cgit/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux.git master
I really fail to see how this can be anything else than a data structure
layout change. There is one counter less.
btw. are cgroups configured at all? What would be the configuration?
--
Michal Hocko
SUSE Labs
Powered by blists - more mailing lists