linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 3/9] mfd: intel_soc_pmic: remove unnecessary CONFIG_PM

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20201102105125.GJ4127@dell>
Date:   Mon, 2 Nov 2020 10:51:25 +0000
From:   Lee Jones <lee.jones@...aro.org>
To:     Andy Shevchenko <andy.shevchenko@...il.com>
Cc:     Coiby Xu <coiby.xu@...il.com>,
        Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@...el.com>,
        Andy Shevchenko <andy@...nel.org>,
        open list <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/9] mfd: intel_soc_pmic: remove unnecessary
 CONFIG_PM_SLEEP

On Mon, 02 Nov 2020, Andy Shevchenko wrote:

> On Mon, Nov 2, 2020 at 10:39 AM Lee Jones <lee.jones@...aro.org> wrote:
> > On Thu, 29 Oct 2020, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
> > > On Thu, Oct 29, 2020 at 5:27 PM Lee Jones <lee.jones@...aro.org> wrote:
> > > > On Thu, 29 Oct 2020, Coiby Xu wrote:
> > > > > On Thu, Oct 29, 2020 at 01:00:29PM +0200, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
> > > > > > On Thu, Oct 29, 2020 at 06:06:41PM +0800, Coiby Xu wrote:
> > > > > > > SIMPLE_DEV_PM_OPS has already took good care of CONFIG_PM_CONFIG.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Have you compiled this with
> > > > > >     % make W=1 ...
> > > > > > ?
> > > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > Sorry my bad. I thought I had run "make modules" with CONFIG_PM_SLEEP
> > > > > disabled. I'll run "make W=1 M=..." for each driver after adding
> > > > > __maybe_unused in v2.
> > > >
> > > > No, thank you.  Just keep it as it is.
> > > >
> > > > The current code is space saving.
> > >
> > > Perhaps you need to go thru __maybe_unused handling.
> > > There are pros and cons of each approach, but not above.
> >
> > Do you know that all compilers drop the section?
> 
> At least all that Linux kernel can be officially built with.

Fair enough.

-- 
Lee Jones [李琼斯]
Senior Technical Lead - Developer Services
Linaro.org │ Open source software for Arm SoCs
Follow Linaro: Facebook | Twitter | Blog