linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 2/2] m68k: m68328: remove duplicate code

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Mon, 2 Nov 2020 10:13:42 +1000
From:   Greg Ungerer <gerg@...ux-m68k.org>
To:     Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...nel.org>, Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>
Cc:     Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@...ux-m68k.org>,
        linux-m68k <linux-m68k@...ts.linux-m68k.org>,
        "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] m68k: m68328: remove duplicate code

Hi Arnd,

On 31/10/20 12:25 am, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 19, 2020 at 2:06 PM Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de> wrote:
>>
>> On Mon, Oct 19, 2020 at 1:45 AM Greg Ungerer <gerg@...ux-m68k.org> wrote:
>>> On 15/10/20 10:32 pm, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
>>
>>>> diff --git a/arch/m68k/Kconfig.machine b/arch/m68k/Kconfig.machine
>>>> index 17e8c3a292d7..1851c66e8667 100644
>>>> --- a/arch/m68k/Kconfig.machine
>>>> +++ b/arch/m68k/Kconfig.machine
>>>> @@ -136,14 +136,13 @@ config SUN3
>>>>
>>>>          If you don't want to compile a kernel exclusively for a Sun 3, say N.
>>>>
>>>> -endif # M68KCLASSIC
>>>> -
>>>>    config PILOT
>>>>        bool
>>>>
>>>>    config PILOT3
>>>>        bool "Pilot 1000/5000, PalmPilot Personal/Pro, or PalmIII support"
>>>> -     depends on M68328
>>>> +     depends on !MMU
>>>> +     select M68328
>>>
>>> Given that M68328 depends on !MMU do you also need or want that here?
>>
>> Yes, that is exactly the reason: if M68328 depends on !MMU and gets
>> selected by something that lacks the !MMU dependency, we'd get a
>> Kconfig warning and a failed build when enabling PILOT3 with MMU
>> enabled.
> 
> It looks like my reply never made it out because of mail server issues.
> I hope the above answers your question.
> 
> I'm rebasing this series (along with some others) now, and will resend in a bit.

Ok, no worries.
Otherwise looked good.

I will review v2 and most likely push into the m68knommu git tree.

Regards
Greg