linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v5 08/15] mm: Add unsafe_follow

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20201102130115.GC36674@ziepe.ca>
Date:   Mon, 2 Nov 2020 09:01:15 -0400
From:   Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@...pe.ca>
To:     Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@...ll.ch>
Cc:     Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org>,
        DRI Development <dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org>,
        LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        KVM list <kvm@...r.kernel.org>, Linux MM <linux-mm@...ck.org>,
        Linux ARM <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
        linux-samsung-soc <linux-samsung-soc@...r.kernel.org>,
        "open list:DMA BUFFER SHARING FRAMEWORK" 
        <linux-media@...r.kernel.org>,
        Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@...el.com>,
        Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>,
        Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@...el.com>,
        Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
        John Hubbard <jhubbard@...dia.com>,
        J??r??me Glisse <jglisse@...hat.com>, Jan Kara <jack@...e.cz>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 08/15] mm: Add unsafe_follow_pfn

On Mon, Nov 02, 2020 at 01:56:10PM +0100, Daniel Vetter wrote:
> On Mon, Nov 2, 2020 at 8:29 AM Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org> wrote:
> >
> > On Fri, Oct 30, 2020 at 11:08:08AM +0100, Daniel Vetter wrote:
> > > Also mark up follow_pfn as EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL. The only safe way to use
> > > that by drivers/modules is together with an mmu_notifier, and that's
> > > all _GPL stuff.
> >
> > I also think it also needs to be renamed to explicitly break any existing
> > users out of tree or int the submission queue.
> 
> Ok I looked at the mmu notifier locking again and noticed that
> mm->subscriptions has its own spinlock. Since there usually shouldn't
> be a huge pile of these I think it's feasible to check for the mmu
> notifier in follow_pfn. And that would stuff this gap for good. I'll
> throw that on top as a final patch and see what people think.

Probably the simplest is to just check mm_has_notifiers() when in
lockdep or something very simple like that

Jason