linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v3 2/4] docs: Clarify abstract scale usage for power values in Energy Model

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Mon, 2 Nov 2020 13:45:36 +0000
From:   Quentin Perret <qperret@...gle.com>
To:     Lukasz Luba <lukasz.luba@....com>
Cc:     linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-pm@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-doc@...r.kernel.org, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, robh+dt@...nel.org,
        amitk@...nel.org, corbet@....net, daniel.lezcano@...aro.org,
        Dietmar.Eggemann@....com, morten.rasmussen@....com,
        dianders@...omium.org, mka@...omium.org, rnayak@...eaurora.org,
        rafael@...nel.org, sudeep.holla@....com, viresh.kumar@...aro.org,
        sboyd@...nel.org, nm@...com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 2/4] docs: Clarify abstract scale usage for power
 values in Energy Model

On Monday 19 Oct 2020 at 15:05:59 (+0100), Lukasz Luba wrote:
> diff --git a/Documentation/driver-api/thermal/power_allocator.rst b/Documentation/driver-api/thermal/power_allocator.rst
> index 67b6a3297238..b7992ae84fef 100644
> --- a/Documentation/driver-api/thermal/power_allocator.rst
> +++ b/Documentation/driver-api/thermal/power_allocator.rst
> @@ -71,7 +71,10 @@ to the speed-grade of the silicon.  `sustainable_power` is therefore
>  simply an estimate, and may be tuned to affect the aggressiveness of
>  the thermal ramp. For reference, the sustainable power of a 4" phone
>  is typically 2000mW, while on a 10" tablet is around 4500mW (may vary
> -depending on screen size).
> +depending on screen size). It is possible to have the power value
> +expressed in an abstract scale. This is the case when the Energy Model
> +provides the power values in an abstract scale.

Maybe remove one of the 2 sentences?

Thanks,
Quentin