[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20201102135449.GE2221764@google.com>
Date: Mon, 2 Nov 2020 13:54:49 +0000
From: Quentin Perret <qperret@...gle.com>
To: Lukasz Luba <lukasz.luba@....com>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-pm@...r.kernel.org,
linux-doc@...r.kernel.org, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, daniel.lezcano@...aro.org,
robh+dt@...nel.org, amitk@...nel.org, corbet@....net,
Dietmar.Eggemann@....com, morten.rasmussen@....com,
dianders@...omium.org, mka@...omium.org, rnayak@...eaurora.org,
rafael@...nel.org, sudeep.holla@....com, viresh.kumar@...aro.org,
sboyd@...nel.org, nm@...com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 0/4] Clarify abstract scale usage for power values in
Energy Model, EAS and IPA
On Monday 02 Nov 2020 at 08:54:38 (+0000), Lukasz Luba wrote:
> Gentle ping to Quentin and Daniel for sharing opinion on this patch set.
> If you are OK, then I could use this as a base for next work.
One or two small nits, but overall this LGTM. Thanks Lukasz.
> As you probably know I am working also on 'sustainable power' estimation
> which could be used when there is no DT value but it comes from FW.
> That would meet requirement from Doug, when the DT cannot be used,
> but we have sustainable levels from FW [1].
Cool, and also, I'd be happy to hear from Doug if passing the sustained
power via sysfs is good enough for his use-case in the meantime?
Thanks,
Quentin
Powered by blists - more mailing lists