[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <4ff202e1-1171-6ad1-5a5a-f384e987f77b@linux.ibm.com>
Date: Mon, 2 Nov 2020 21:36:11 +0530
From: kajoljain <kjain@...ux.ibm.com>
To: Tom Rix <trix@...hat.com>, maximlevitsky@...il.com,
oakad@...oo.com, ulf.hansson@...aro.org
Cc: linux-mmc@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] memstick: mspro_block: remove unneeded semicolon
On 11/2/20 7:12 PM, Tom Rix wrote:
>
> On 11/1/20 10:51 PM, kajoljain wrote:
>>
>> On 10/31/20 7:18 PM, trix@...hat.com wrote:
>>> From: Tom Rix <trix@...hat.com>
>>>
>>> A semicolon is not needed after a switch statement.
>> Hi Tom,
>> I was checking this patch. Not sure if it will come under as fix patch. Since this is not fixing
>> any logical issue do we still need to add fix tag?
>
> My rule of thumb is a fix means the kernel needs to be recompiled.
Yes make sense. Thanks for confirming.
Thanks,
Kajol Jain
>
> This isn't a fix.
>
> Tom
>
>>
>> Thanks,
>> Kajol Jain
>>> Signed-off-by: Tom Rix <trix@...hat.com>
>>> ---
>>> drivers/memstick/core/mspro_block.c | 2 +-
>>> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>>>
>>> diff --git a/drivers/memstick/core/mspro_block.c b/drivers/memstick/core/mspro_block.c
>>> index cd6b8d4f2335..afb892e7ffc6 100644
>>> --- a/drivers/memstick/core/mspro_block.c
>>> +++ b/drivers/memstick/core/mspro_block.c
>>> @@ -276,7 +276,7 @@ static const char *mspro_block_attr_name(unsigned char tag)
>>> return "attr_devinfo";
>>> default:
>>> return NULL;
>>> - };
>>> + }
>>> }
>>>
>>> typedef ssize_t (*sysfs_show_t)(struct device *dev,
>>>
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists