[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <10e8a8f83a5d6cc77120ebad3b1ab3c2@codeaurora.org>
Date: Mon, 02 Nov 2020 08:52:44 -0800
From: Bhaumik Bhatt <bbhatt@...eaurora.org>
To: Manivannan Sadhasivam <manivannan.sadhasivam@...aro.org>
Cc: linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org, hemantk@...eaurora.org,
jhugo@...eaurora.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 10/12] bus: mhi: core: Separate system error and power
down handling
Hi Mani,
On 2020-10-30 23:54, Manivannan Sadhasivam wrote:
> Hi Bhaumik,
>
> On 31 October 2020 1:04:07 AM IST, Bhaumik Bhatt
> <bbhatt@...eaurora.org> wrote:
>> Hi Mani,
>>
>> On 2020-10-30 07:06, Manivannan Sadhasivam wrote:
>>> On Thu, Oct 29, 2020 at 09:10:55PM -0700, Bhaumik Bhatt wrote:
>>>> Currently, there exist a set of if...else statements in the
>>>> mhi_pm_disable_transition() function which make handling system
>>>> error and disable transitions differently complex. To make that
>>>> cleaner and facilitate differences in behavior, separate these
>>>> two transitions for MHI host.
>>>>
>>>
>>> And this results in a lot of duplicated code :/
>>>
>>> Thanks,
>>> Mani
>>>
>>
>> I knew this was coming. Mainly, we can avoid adding confusing
>> if...else
>> statements that plague the current mhi_pm_disable_transition()
>> function
>>
>> and in
>> return for some duplicate code, we can make handling separate use
>> cases
>>
>> easier
>> as they could pop-up anytime in the future.
>>
>
> If that happens then do it but now, please no.
>
> Thanks,
> Mani
>
It had to be done for 11/12 and 12/12 (last two) patches of the series.
It's a
much cleaner approach and allows us to handle states better. We should
be moving
the dev_state and EE to "Reset" and "Disable" states soon enough when a
shutdown
is initiated and we can resolve bugs such as freeing the IRQs for a
shutdown
sooner as well. Since these differences in shutdown versus SYS_ERROR
processing
are already increasingly apparent and more could come, this patch had to
step
in.
bus: mhi: core: Mark and maintain device states early on after power
down
bus: mhi: core: Remove MHI event ring IRQ handlers when powering down
>>>> Signed-off-by: Bhaumik Bhatt <bbhatt@...eaurora.org>
>>>> ---
>>>> drivers/bus/mhi/core/pm.c | 159
>>>> +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-------
>>>> 1 file changed, 137 insertions(+), 22 deletions(-)
>>>>
>>>> diff --git a/drivers/bus/mhi/core/pm.c b/drivers/bus/mhi/core/pm.c
>>>> index 1d04e401..347ae7d 100644
>>>> --- a/drivers/bus/mhi/core/pm.c
>>>> +++ b/drivers/bus/mhi/core/pm.c
>>>> @@ -444,7 +444,7 @@ static int mhi_pm_mission_mode_transition(struct
>>
>>>> mhi_controller *mhi_cntrl)
>>>> return ret;
>>>> }
>>>>
>>>> -/* Handle SYS_ERR and Shutdown transitions */
>>>> +/* Handle shutdown transitions */
>>>> static void mhi_pm_disable_transition(struct mhi_controller
>>>> *mhi_cntrl,
>>>> enum mhi_pm_state transition_state)
>>>> {
>>>> @@ -460,10 +460,6 @@ static void mhi_pm_disable_transition(struct
>>>> mhi_controller *mhi_cntrl,
>>>> to_mhi_pm_state_str(mhi_cntrl->pm_state),
>>>> to_mhi_pm_state_str(transition_state));
>>>>
>>>> - /* We must notify MHI control driver so it can clean up first */
>>>> - if (transition_state == MHI_PM_SYS_ERR_PROCESS)
>>>> - mhi_cntrl->status_cb(mhi_cntrl, MHI_CB_SYS_ERROR);
>>>> -
>>>> mutex_lock(&mhi_cntrl->pm_mutex);
>>>> write_lock_irq(&mhi_cntrl->pm_lock);
>>>> prev_state = mhi_cntrl->pm_state;
>>>> @@ -502,11 +498,8 @@ static void mhi_pm_disable_transition(struct
>>>> mhi_controller *mhi_cntrl,
>>>> MHICTRL_RESET_SHIFT,
>>>> &in_reset) ||
>>>> !in_reset, timeout);
>>>> - if ((!ret || in_reset) && cur_state == MHI_PM_SYS_ERR_PROCESS) {
>>>> + if (!ret || in_reset)
>>>> dev_err(dev, "Device failed to exit MHI Reset state\n");
>>>> - mutex_unlock(&mhi_cntrl->pm_mutex);
>>>> - return;
>>>> - }
>>>>
>>>> /*
>>>> * Device will clear BHI_INTVEC as a part of RESET processing,
>>>> @@ -566,19 +559,142 @@ static void mhi_pm_disable_transition(struct
>>>> mhi_controller *mhi_cntrl,
>>>> er_ctxt->wp = er_ctxt->rbase;
>>>> }
>>>>
>>>> - if (cur_state == MHI_PM_SYS_ERR_PROCESS) {
>>>> - mhi_ready_state_transition(mhi_cntrl);
>>>> - } else {
>>>> - /* Move to disable state */
>>>> - write_lock_irq(&mhi_cntrl->pm_lock);
>>>> - cur_state = mhi_tryset_pm_state(mhi_cntrl, MHI_PM_DISABLE);
>>>> - write_unlock_irq(&mhi_cntrl->pm_lock);
>>>> - if (unlikely(cur_state != MHI_PM_DISABLE))
>>>> - dev_err(dev, "Error moving from PM state: %s to: %s\n",
>>>> - to_mhi_pm_state_str(cur_state),
>>>> - to_mhi_pm_state_str(MHI_PM_DISABLE));
>>>> + /* Move to disable state */
>>>> + write_lock_irq(&mhi_cntrl->pm_lock);
>>>> + cur_state = mhi_tryset_pm_state(mhi_cntrl, MHI_PM_DISABLE);
>>>> + write_unlock_irq(&mhi_cntrl->pm_lock);
>>>> + if (unlikely(cur_state != MHI_PM_DISABLE))
>>>> + dev_err(dev, "Error moving from PM state: %s to: %s\n",
>>>> + to_mhi_pm_state_str(cur_state),
>>>> + to_mhi_pm_state_str(MHI_PM_DISABLE));
>>>> +
>>>> + dev_dbg(dev, "Exiting with PM state: %s, MHI state: %s\n",
>>>> + to_mhi_pm_state_str(mhi_cntrl->pm_state),
>>>> + TO_MHI_STATE_STR(mhi_cntrl->dev_state));
>>>> +
>>>> + mutex_unlock(&mhi_cntrl->pm_mutex);
>>>> +}
>>>> +
>>>> +/* Handle system error transitions */
>>>> +static void mhi_pm_sys_error_transition(struct mhi_controller
>>>> *mhi_cntrl)
>>>> +{
>>>> + enum mhi_pm_state cur_state, prev_state;
>>>> + struct mhi_event *mhi_event;
>>>> + struct mhi_cmd_ctxt *cmd_ctxt;
>>>> + struct mhi_cmd *mhi_cmd;
>>>> + struct mhi_event_ctxt *er_ctxt;
>>>> + struct device *dev = &mhi_cntrl->mhi_dev->dev;
>>>> + int ret, i;
>>>> +
>>>> + dev_dbg(dev, "Transitioning from PM state: %s to: %s\n",
>>>> + to_mhi_pm_state_str(mhi_cntrl->pm_state),
>>>> + to_mhi_pm_state_str(MHI_PM_SYS_ERR_PROCESS));
>>>> +
>>>> + /* We must notify MHI control driver so it can clean up first */
>>>> + mhi_cntrl->status_cb(mhi_cntrl, MHI_CB_SYS_ERROR);
>>>> +
>>>> + mutex_lock(&mhi_cntrl->pm_mutex);
>>>> + write_lock_irq(&mhi_cntrl->pm_lock);
>>>> + prev_state = mhi_cntrl->pm_state;
>>>> + cur_state = mhi_tryset_pm_state(mhi_cntrl,
>> MHI_PM_SYS_ERR_PROCESS);
>>>> + write_unlock_irq(&mhi_cntrl->pm_lock);
>>>> +
>>>> + if (cur_state != MHI_PM_SYS_ERR_PROCESS) {
>>>> + dev_err(dev, "Failed to transition from PM state: %s to: %s\n",
>>>> + to_mhi_pm_state_str(cur_state),
>>>> + to_mhi_pm_state_str(MHI_PM_SYS_ERR_PROCESS));
>>>> + goto exit_sys_error_transition;
>>>> + }
>>>> +
>>>> + mhi_cntrl->ee = MHI_EE_DISABLE_TRANSITION;
>>>> + mhi_cntrl->dev_state = MHI_STATE_RESET;
>>>> +
>>>> + /* Wake up threads waiting for state transition */
>>>> + wake_up_all(&mhi_cntrl->state_event);
>>>> +
>>>> + /* Trigger MHI RESET so that the device will not access host
>> memory
>>>> */
>>>> + if (MHI_REG_ACCESS_VALID(prev_state)) {
>>>> + u32 in_reset = -1;
>>>> + unsigned long timeout = msecs_to_jiffies(mhi_cntrl->timeout_ms);
>>>> +
>>>> + dev_dbg(dev, "Triggering MHI Reset in device\n");
>>>> + mhi_set_mhi_state(mhi_cntrl, MHI_STATE_RESET);
>>>> +
>>>> + /* Wait for the reset bit to be cleared by the device */
>>>> + ret = wait_event_timeout(mhi_cntrl->state_event,
>>>> + mhi_read_reg_field(mhi_cntrl,
>>>> + mhi_cntrl->regs,
>>>> + MHICTRL,
>>>> + MHICTRL_RESET_MASK,
>>>> + MHICTRL_RESET_SHIFT,
>>>> + &in_reset) ||
>>>> + !in_reset, timeout);
>>>> + if (!ret || in_reset) {
>>>> + dev_err(dev, "Device failed to exit MHI Reset state\n");
>>>> + goto exit_sys_error_transition;
>>>> + }
>>>> +
>>>> + /*
>>>> + * Device will clear BHI_INTVEC as a part of RESET processing,
>>>> + * hence re-program it
>>>> + */
>>>> + mhi_write_reg(mhi_cntrl, mhi_cntrl->bhi, BHI_INTVEC, 0);
>>>> + }
>>>> +
>>>> + dev_dbg(dev,
>>>> + "Waiting for all pending event ring processing to complete\n");
>>>> + mhi_event = mhi_cntrl->mhi_event;
>>>> + for (i = 0; i < mhi_cntrl->total_ev_rings; i++, mhi_event++) {
>>>> + if (mhi_event->offload_ev)
>>>> + continue;
>>>> + tasklet_kill(&mhi_event->task);
>>>> }
>>>>
>>>> + /* Release lock and wait for all pending threads to complete */
>>>> + mutex_unlock(&mhi_cntrl->pm_mutex);
>>>> + dev_dbg(dev, "Waiting for all pending threads to complete\n");
>>>> + wake_up_all(&mhi_cntrl->state_event);
>>>> +
>>>> + dev_dbg(dev, "Reset all active channels and remove MHI
>> devices\n");
>>>> + device_for_each_child(mhi_cntrl->cntrl_dev, NULL,
>>>> mhi_destroy_device);
>>>> +
>>>> + mutex_lock(&mhi_cntrl->pm_mutex);
>>>> +
>>>> + WARN_ON(atomic_read(&mhi_cntrl->dev_wake));
>>>> + WARN_ON(atomic_read(&mhi_cntrl->pending_pkts));
>>>> +
>>>> + /* Reset the ev rings and cmd rings */
>>>> + dev_dbg(dev, "Resetting EV CTXT and CMD CTXT\n");
>>>> + mhi_cmd = mhi_cntrl->mhi_cmd;
>>>> + cmd_ctxt = mhi_cntrl->mhi_ctxt->cmd_ctxt;
>>>> + for (i = 0; i < NR_OF_CMD_RINGS; i++, mhi_cmd++, cmd_ctxt++) {
>>>> + struct mhi_ring *ring = &mhi_cmd->ring;
>>>> +
>>>> + ring->rp = ring->base;
>>>> + ring->wp = ring->base;
>>>> + cmd_ctxt->rp = cmd_ctxt->rbase;
>>>> + cmd_ctxt->wp = cmd_ctxt->rbase;
>>>> + }
>>>> +
>>>> + mhi_event = mhi_cntrl->mhi_event;
>>>> + er_ctxt = mhi_cntrl->mhi_ctxt->er_ctxt;
>>>> + for (i = 0; i < mhi_cntrl->total_ev_rings; i++, er_ctxt++,
>>>> + mhi_event++) {
>>>> + struct mhi_ring *ring = &mhi_event->ring;
>>>> +
>>>> + /* Skip offload events */
>>>> + if (mhi_event->offload_ev)
>>>> + continue;
>>>> +
>>>> + ring->rp = ring->base;
>>>> + ring->wp = ring->base;
>>>> + er_ctxt->rp = er_ctxt->rbase;
>>>> + er_ctxt->wp = er_ctxt->rbase;
>>>> + }
>>>> +
>>>> + mhi_ready_state_transition(mhi_cntrl);
>>>> +
>>>> +exit_sys_error_transition:
>>>> dev_dbg(dev, "Exiting with PM state: %s, MHI state: %s\n",
>>>> to_mhi_pm_state_str(mhi_cntrl->pm_state),
>>>> TO_MHI_STATE_STR(mhi_cntrl->dev_state));
>>>> @@ -666,8 +782,7 @@ void mhi_pm_st_worker(struct work_struct *work)
>>>> mhi_ready_state_transition(mhi_cntrl);
>>>> break;
>>>> case DEV_ST_TRANSITION_SYS_ERR:
>>>> - mhi_pm_disable_transition
>>>> - (mhi_cntrl, MHI_PM_SYS_ERR_PROCESS);
>>>> + mhi_pm_sys_error_transition(mhi_cntrl);
>>>> break;
>>>> case DEV_ST_TRANSITION_DISABLE:
>>>> mhi_pm_disable_transition
>>>> --
>>>> The Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of the Code Aurora
>>>> Forum,
>>>> a Linux Foundation Collaborative Project
>>>>
>>
>> Thanks,
>> Bhaumik
Thanks,
Bhaumik
--
The Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of the Code Aurora
Forum,
a Linux Foundation Collaborative Project
Powered by blists - more mailing lists