linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v7 0/6] CTU CAN FD open-source IP core SocketCAN driver, PCI, platform integration and documentation

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Tue, 3 Nov 2020 17:10:30 +0100
From:   Marc Kleine-Budde <mkl@...gutronix.de>
To:     Ondrej Ille <ondrej.ille@...il.com>
Cc:     Pavel Pisa <pisa@....felk.cvut.cz>, linux-can@...r.kernel.org,
        devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
        Oliver Hartkopp <socketcan@...tkopp.net>,
        Wolfgang Grandegger <wg@...ndegger.com>,
        David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>,
        Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>, mark.rutland@....com,
        Carsten Emde <c.emde@...dl.org>, armbru@...hat.com,
        netdev@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        Marin Jerabek <martin.jerabek01@...il.com>,
        Jiri Novak <jnovak@....cvut.cz>,
        Jaroslav Beran <jara.beran@...il.com>,
        Petr Porazil <porazil@...ron.com>, Pavel Machek <pavel@....cz>,
        Drew Fustini <pdp7pdp7@...il.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v7 0/6] CTU CAN FD open-source IP core SocketCAN driver,
 PCI, platform integration and documentation

On 11/3/20 2:36 PM, Ondrej Ille wrote:
> Hello Marc,
> 
> thank you for review, I appreciate it. We will process all your notes, and get
> rid of uin32_t and bitfields then.
> 
> As Pavel pointed out, there are user space tests using this stuff, so it is
> not just search and replace work. We will extend our IP-XACT generation
> toolchain (what a strong word for bunch of python scripts...), to generate 
> Linux specific headers with GEN_MASK and BIT then.

Fine!
> It will take some time, since we have to modify quite a lot of stuff and
> re-test it then, but we will try to do it fast. Btw, do you agree with
> separation of HW specific part of driver into "_hw" file, or would you
> preffer to get rid of this abstraction layer? If we should get rid of it, we
> will, but it would take even more time to do it.

I haven't looked at the HW abstraction yet, but will do next. Usually Linux is
considered the HW abstraction layer :)

Marc

-- 
Pengutronix e.K.                 | Marc Kleine-Budde           |
Embedded Linux                   | https://www.pengutronix.de  |
Vertretung West/Dortmund         | Phone: +49-231-2826-924     |
Amtsgericht Hildesheim, HRA 2686 | Fax:   +49-5121-206917-5555 |



Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (489 bytes)