[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20201103111410.64feac6c@rorschach.local.home>
Date: Tue, 3 Nov 2020 11:14:10 -0500
From: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>
To: Petr Mladek <pmladek@...e.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Masami Hiramatsu <mhiramat@...nel.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>,
Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@...hat.com>,
Jiri Kosina <jikos@...nel.org>,
Miroslav Benes <mbenes@...e.cz>,
Jonathan Corbet <corbet@....net>, Guo Ren <guoren@...nel.org>,
"James E.J. Bottomley" <James.Bottomley@...senpartnership.com>,
Helge Deller <deller@....de>,
Michael Ellerman <mpe@...erman.id.au>,
Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@...nel.crashing.org>,
Paul Mackerras <paulus@...ba.org>,
Heiko Carstens <hca@...ux.ibm.com>,
Vasily Gorbik <gor@...ux.ibm.com>,
Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@...ibm.com>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>, x86@...nel.org,
"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>,
Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>,
Anton Vorontsov <anton@...msg.org>,
Colin Cross <ccross@...roid.com>,
Tony Luck <tony.luck@...el.com>,
Joe Lawrence <joe.lawrence@...hat.com>,
Kamalesh Babulal <kamalesh@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab+huawei@...nel.org>,
Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@...utronix.de>,
linux-doc@...r.kernel.org, linux-csky@...r.kernel.org,
linux-parisc@...r.kernel.org, linuxppc-dev@...ts.ozlabs.org,
linux-s390@...r.kernel.org, live-patching@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 11/11 v2.2] ftrace: Add recording of functions that
caused recursion
On Tue, 3 Nov 2020 15:10:43 +0100
Petr Mladek <pmladek@...e.com> wrote:
> BTW: What is actually the purpose of paranoid_test, please?
>
> It prevents nested ftrace_record_recursion() calls on the same CPU
> (recursion, nesting from IRQ, NMI context).
>
> Parallel calls from different CPUs are still possible:
>
> CPU0 CPU1
> if (!atomic_read(¶noid_test)) if (!atomic_read(¶noid_test))
> // passes // passes
> atomic_inc(¶noid_test); atomic_inc(¶noid_test);
>
>
> I do not see how a nested call could cause crash while a parallel
> one would be OK.
>
Yeah, I should make that per cpu, but was lazy. ;-)
It was added at the end.
I'll update that to a per cpu, and local inc operations.
-- Steve
Powered by blists - more mailing lists