[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <cc0e6f6e-2e06-81b3-38b8-fbdc5c772658@nvidia.com>
Date: Tue, 3 Nov 2020 17:06:11 +0000
From: Jon Hunter <jonathanh@...dia.com>
To: Thierry Reding <thierry.reding@...il.com>
CC: David Airlie <airlied@...ux.ie>, Daniel Vetter <daniel@...ll.ch>,
<dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org>, <linux-tegra@...r.kernel.org>,
<linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] drm/tegra: sor: Don't warn on probe deferral
On 03/11/2020 11:44, Jon Hunter wrote:
> Deferred probe is an expected return value for tegra_output_probe().
> Given that the driver deals with it properly, there's no need to output
> a warning that may potentially confuse users.
>
> Signed-off-by: Jon Hunter <jonathanh@...dia.com>
> ---
> drivers/gpu/drm/tegra/sor.c | 2 +-
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/tegra/sor.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/tegra/sor.c
> index e88a17c2937f..5a232055b8cc 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/tegra/sor.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/tegra/sor.c
> @@ -3765,7 +3765,7 @@ static int tegra_sor_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
>
> err = tegra_output_probe(&sor->output);
> if (err < 0) {
> - dev_err(&pdev->dev, "failed to probe output: %d\n", err);
> + dev_err_probe(&pdev->dev, "failed to probe output: %d\n", err);
> return err;
> }
Sorry this is not right. I will fix this in V2.
Jon
--
nvpublic
Powered by blists - more mailing lists