linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH net-next v3 4/4] net: phy: dp83td510: Add support for the DP83TD510 Ethernet PHY

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20201103173817.GP1042051@lunn.ch>
Date:   Tue, 3 Nov 2020 18:38:17 +0100
From:   Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch>
To:     Dan Murphy <dmurphy@...com>
Cc:     Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>, davem@...emloft.net,
        f.fainelli@...il.com, hkallweit1@...il.com, robh@...nel.org,
        devicetree@...r.kernel.org, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next v3 4/4] net: phy: dp83td510: Add support for the
 DP83TD510 Ethernet PHY

> > > > drivers/net/phy/dp83td510.c:70:11: warning: symbol 'dp83td510_feature_array' was not declared. Should it be static?
> > > I did not see this warning. Did you use W=1?
> > I _think_ that one is W=1. All the PHY drivers are W=1 clean, and i
> > want to keep it that way. And i hope to make it the default in a lot
> > of the network code soon.
> OK I built with the W=1 before submission I did not see this but I will try
> some other things.

Then it might be sparse. Try C=1.

     Andrew