linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 4/4] clk: qcom: Add support for SDX55 RPMh clocks

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20201103175317.GC65067@builder.lan>
Date:   Tue, 3 Nov 2020 11:53:17 -0600
From:   Bjorn Andersson <bjorn.andersson@...aro.org>
To:     Manivannan Sadhasivam <manivannan.sadhasivam@...aro.org>
Cc:     sboyd@...nel.org, mturquette@...libre.com, robh+dt@...nel.org,
        vkoul@...nel.org, linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-clk@...r.kernel.org, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 4/4] clk: qcom: Add support for SDX55 RPMh clocks

On Wed 28 Oct 02:42 CDT 2020, Manivannan Sadhasivam wrote:

> Add support for clocks maintained by RPMh in SDX55 SoCs.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Manivannan Sadhasivam <manivannan.sadhasivam@...aro.org>
> ---
>  drivers/clk/qcom/clk-rpmh.c | 20 ++++++++++++++++++++
>  1 file changed, 20 insertions(+)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/clk/qcom/clk-rpmh.c b/drivers/clk/qcom/clk-rpmh.c
> index e2c669b08aff..88d010178b59 100644
> --- a/drivers/clk/qcom/clk-rpmh.c
> +++ b/drivers/clk/qcom/clk-rpmh.c
> @@ -432,6 +432,25 @@ static const struct clk_rpmh_desc clk_rpmh_sm8250 = {
>  	.num_clks = ARRAY_SIZE(sm8250_rpmh_clocks),
>  };
>  
> +DEFINE_CLK_RPMH_VRM(sdx55, rf_clk1, rf_clk1_ao, "rfclkd1", 1);
> +DEFINE_CLK_RPMH_VRM(sdx55, rf_clk2, rf_clk2_ao, "rfclkd2", 1);
> +DEFINE_CLK_RPMH_BCM(sdx55, qpic_clk, "QP0");
> +
> +static struct clk_hw *sdx55_rpmh_clocks[] = {
> +	[RPMH_CXO_CLK]		= &sdm845_bi_tcxo.hw,
> +	[RPMH_CXO_CLK_A]	= &sdm845_bi_tcxo_ao.hw,
> +	[RPMH_RF_CLK1]		= &sdx55_rf_clk1.hw,
> +	[RPMH_RF_CLK1_A]	= &sdx55_rf_clk1_ao.hw,
> +	[RPMH_RF_CLK2]		= &sdx55_rf_clk2.hw,
> +	[RPMH_RF_CLK2_A]	= &sdx55_rf_clk2_ao.hw,
> +	[RPMH_QPIC_CLK]		= &sdx55_qpic_clk.hw,
> +};
> +
> +static const struct clk_rpmh_desc clk_rpmh_sdx55 = {
> +	.clks = sdx55_rpmh_clocks,
> +	.num_clks = ARRAY_SIZE(sdx55_rpmh_clocks),
> +};
> +
>  static struct clk_hw *of_clk_rpmh_hw_get(struct of_phandle_args *clkspec,
>  					 void *data)
>  {
> @@ -519,6 +538,7 @@ static const struct of_device_id clk_rpmh_match_table[] = {
>  	{ .compatible = "qcom,sdm845-rpmh-clk", .data = &clk_rpmh_sdm845},
>  	{ .compatible = "qcom,sm8150-rpmh-clk", .data = &clk_rpmh_sm8150},
>  	{ .compatible = "qcom,sm8250-rpmh-clk", .data = &clk_rpmh_sm8250},
> +	{ .compatible = "qcom,sdx55-rpmh-clk", .data = &clk_rpmh_sdx55},

The sort order is off here.

Regards,
Bjorn

>  	{ }
>  };
>  MODULE_DEVICE_TABLE(of, clk_rpmh_match_table);
> -- 
> 2.17.1
>