[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20201103183221.GA1003057@dtor-ws>
Date: Tue, 3 Nov 2020 10:32:21 -0800
From: Dmitry Torokhov <dmitry.torokhov@...il.com>
To: Benjamin Tissoires <benjamin.tissoires@...hat.com>
Cc: Hans de Goede <hdegoede@...hat.com>,
Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
Douglas Anderson <dianders@...omium.org>,
Jiri Kosina <jkosina@...e.cz>,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
Linux Input <linux-input@...r.kernel.org>,
Stephen Boyd <swboyd@...omium.org>,
Kai Heng Feng <kai.heng.feng@...onical.com>,
andrea@...gia.bo.it, Aaron Ma <aaron.ma@...onical.com>,
Daniel Playfair Cal <daniel.playfair.cal@...il.com>,
Jiri Kosina <jikos@...nel.org>, Pavel Balan <admin@...ma.net>,
You-Sheng Yang <vicamo.yang@...onical.com>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 2/3] HID: i2c-hid: Allow subclasses of i2c-hid for
power sequencing
On Tue, Nov 03, 2020 at 01:42:47PM +0100, Benjamin Tissoires wrote:
>
> I also want to say that I like the general idea of Doug's patch.
> Having a separate driver that handles the specific use case of goodix
> is really nice, as it allows to just load this driver without touching
> the core of i2c-hid. I believe this is in line with what Google tries
> to do with their kernel that OEMs can not touch, but only add overlays
> to it. The implementation is not polished (I don't think this new
> driver belongs to the input subsystem), but I like the general idea of
> having the "subclassing". Maybe we can make it prettier with Hans'
> suggestion, given that this mainly means we are transforming
> i2c-hid-core.c into a library.
>
> As for where this new goodix driver goes, it can stay in
> drivers/hid/i2c-hid IMO.
Yep, I agree, it has nothing to do with input (except the device being
physically a touchscreen ;) ), so driver/hid/i2c-hid makes most sense to
me too.
Thanks.
--
Dmitry
Powered by blists - more mailing lists