[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20201103203301.754728418@linuxfoundation.org>
Date: Tue, 3 Nov 2020 21:36:04 +0100
From: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
stable@...r.kernel.org,
Todd Brandt <todd.e.brandt@...ux.intel.com>,
"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael.j.wysocki@...el.com>
Subject: [PATCH 5.4 116/214] ACPI: EC: PM: Drop ec_no_wakeup check from acpi_ec_dispatch_gpe()
From: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@...el.com>
commit e0e9ce390d7bc6a705653d4a8aa4ea92c9a65e53 upstream.
It turns out that in some cases there are EC events to flush in
acpi_ec_dispatch_gpe() even though the ec_no_wakeup kernel parameter
is set and the EC GPE is disabled while sleeping, so drop the
ec_no_wakeup check that prevents those events from being processed
from acpi_ec_dispatch_gpe().
Reported-by: Todd Brandt <todd.e.brandt@...ux.intel.com>
Cc: 5.4+ <stable@...r.kernel.org> # 5.4+
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@...el.com>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
---
drivers/acpi/ec.c | 3 ---
1 file changed, 3 deletions(-)
--- a/drivers/acpi/ec.c
+++ b/drivers/acpi/ec.c
@@ -1968,9 +1968,6 @@ bool acpi_ec_dispatch_gpe(void)
if (acpi_any_gpe_status_set(first_ec->gpe))
return true;
- if (ec_no_wakeup)
- return false;
-
/*
* Dispatch the EC GPE in-band, but do not report wakeup in any case
* to allow the caller to process events properly after that.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists