lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20201103210349.GE1583@kunai>
Date:   Tue, 3 Nov 2020 22:03:49 +0100
From:   Wolfram Sang <wsa@...nel.org>
To:     Michael Wu <michael.wu@...ics.com>
Cc:     Jarkko Nikula <jarkko.nikula@...ux.intel.com>,
        Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com>,
        Mika Westerberg <mika.westerberg@...ux.intel.com>,
        linux-i2c@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        Morgan Chang <morgan.chang@...ics.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] i2c: designware: slave should do WRITE_REQUESTED
 before WRITE_RECEIVED

Hi Michael,

> Documentation/i2c/slave-interface.rst says that I2C_SLAVE_WRITE_REQUESTED,
> which is mandatory, should be sent while the data did not arrive yet. It
> means in a write-request I2C_SLAVE_WRITE_REQUESTED should be reported
> before any I2C_SLAVE_WRITE_RECEIVED.

Correct.

> dev->status can be used to record the current state, especially Designware
> I2C controller has no interrupts to identify a write-request. This patch

Just double-checking: the designware HW does not raise an interrupt when
its own address + RW bit has been received?

Kind regards,

   Wolfram


Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (834 bytes)

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ