linux-kernel - Re: [GIT PULL] Docs-build warning fixes for 5.10-rc3

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CAHk-=wghhw0SpqSKKUqt5eum=UfLD3Qa0suoRxLy_cJc4hChug@mail.gmail.com>
Date:   Tue, 3 Nov 2020 13:18:27 -0800
From:   Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
To:     Jonathan Corbet <corbet@....net>,
        Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>
Cc:     LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        "open list:DOCUMENTATION" <linux-doc@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [GIT PULL] Docs-build warning fixes for 5.10-rc3

On Tue, Nov 3, 2020 at 11:44 AM Jonathan Corbet <corbet@....net> wrote:
>
> This pull contains a series of warning fixes from Mauro; once applied, the
> number of warnings from the once-noisy docs build process is nearly zero.
> Getting to this point has required a lot of work; once there, hopefully we
> can keep things that way.

I wonder if it is quiet enough that we could make new doc build noise
trigger some kind of linux-next warning?

I know Stephen was at least looking at doc build warnings justding by
the thread a couple of weeks ago.

             Linus