lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20201103203305.031549466@linuxfoundation.org>
Date:   Tue,  3 Nov 2020 21:36:40 +0100
From:   Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To:     linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc:     Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
        stable@...r.kernel.org, Lars-Peter Clausen <lars@...afoo.de>,
        Jonathan Cameron <Jonathan.Cameron@...wei.com>,
        Andy Shevchenko <andy.shevchenko@...il.com>,
        Akinobu Mita <akinobu.mita@...il.com>, Stable@...r.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH 5.4 152/214] iio:adc:ti-adc0832 Fix alignment issue with timestamp

From: Jonathan Cameron <Jonathan.Cameron@...wei.com>

commit 39e91f3be4cba51c1560bcda3a343ed1f64dc916 upstream.

One of a class of bugs pointed out by Lars in a recent review.
iio_push_to_buffers_with_timestamp assumes the buffer used is aligned
to the size of the timestamp (8 bytes).  This is not guaranteed in
this driver which uses an array of smaller elements on the stack.

We fix this issues by moving to a suitable structure in the iio_priv()
data with alignment explicitly requested.  This data is allocated
with kzalloc so no data can leak apart from previous readings.
Note that previously no data could leak 'including' previous readings
but I don't think it is an issue to potentially leak them like
this now does.

In this case the postioning of the timestamp is depends on what
other channels are enabled. As such we cannot use a structure to
make the alignment explicit as it would be missleading by suggesting
only one possible location for the timestamp.

Fixes: 815bbc87462a ("iio: ti-adc0832: add triggered buffer support")
Reported-by: Lars-Peter Clausen <lars@...afoo.de>
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Cameron <Jonathan.Cameron@...wei.com>
Reviewed-by: Andy Shevchenko <andy.shevchenko@...il.com>
Cc: Akinobu Mita <akinobu.mita@...il.com>
Cc: <Stable@...r.kernel.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20200722155103.979802-25-jic23@kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>

---
 drivers/iio/adc/ti-adc0832.c |   11 ++++++++---
 1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)

--- a/drivers/iio/adc/ti-adc0832.c
+++ b/drivers/iio/adc/ti-adc0832.c
@@ -28,6 +28,12 @@ struct adc0832 {
 	struct regulator *reg;
 	struct mutex lock;
 	u8 mux_bits;
+	/*
+	 * Max size needed: 16x 1 byte ADC data + 8 bytes timestamp
+	 * May be shorter if not all channels are enabled subject
+	 * to the timestamp remaining 8 byte aligned.
+	 */
+	u8 data[24] __aligned(8);
 
 	u8 tx_buf[2] ____cacheline_aligned;
 	u8 rx_buf[2];
@@ -199,7 +205,6 @@ static irqreturn_t adc0832_trigger_handl
 	struct iio_poll_func *pf = p;
 	struct iio_dev *indio_dev = pf->indio_dev;
 	struct adc0832 *adc = iio_priv(indio_dev);
-	u8 data[24] = { }; /* 16x 1 byte ADC data + 8 bytes timestamp */
 	int scan_index;
 	int i = 0;
 
@@ -217,10 +222,10 @@ static irqreturn_t adc0832_trigger_handl
 			goto out;
 		}
 
-		data[i] = ret;
+		adc->data[i] = ret;
 		i++;
 	}
-	iio_push_to_buffers_with_timestamp(indio_dev, data,
+	iio_push_to_buffers_with_timestamp(indio_dev, adc->data,
 					   iio_get_time_ns(indio_dev));
 out:
 	mutex_unlock(&adc->lock);


Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ